Page 4 of 5

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 20th, 2022, 3:21 am
by Torgo
jlfitz wrote: September 20th, 2022, 2:41 am https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/jlfi ... 00/jlfitz/

unrankled
The yearly return of jlfitz, this humble titan of ICM rankings.
^_^

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 20th, 2022, 5:07 pm
by BaalMan

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 21st, 2022, 8:29 am
by Tim2460
And ... we're abore 60 voters.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 21st, 2022, 10:34 pm
by Rufus-T
Using the same list from last year. Ranked: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls083671991/

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 12:39 am
by airdolll
A question I have: when making a group ranked list, could some of the groups consist of one sigle film?
Example:
Group 1: #1
Group 2: #2
Group 3: #3
Group 4: #4-10

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 6:05 am
by Tim2460
Why not... But your example is not the best : 1 2 3 movies will get the same point as the ranked 3 + group behind.
Out Java tools can't handle group ranking yet... So it's manual computing... The more complicated it gets... The more possibility of error rising.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 10:21 am
by cayh

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 12:17 pm
by GruesomeTwosome
GruesomeTwosome wrote: August 25th, 2022, 2:17 am https://www.imdb.com/list/ls020489598/ (ranked)
FYI, I just manually removed all of the 400+ check films that I still had on my list. Might still add a title or two if I watch anything worthy before the deadline.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 7:59 pm
by airdolll
Tim2460 wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 6:05 am Why not... But your example is not the best : 1 2 3 movies will get the same point as the ranked 3 + group behind.
Out Java tools can't handle group ranking yet... So it's manual computing... The more complicated it gets... The more possibility of error rising.
I don't think I understand it, sorry. Wouldn't it be like:
#1 - 100 pts
#2 - 99 pts
#3 - 98 pts
#4 - 94 pts
...
#10 - 94 pts

?

In any case, I wouldn't want to make it troublesome for you if it's a lot of extra work, so I might just make a group-ranked list with less groups or a partially ranked one

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 10:10 pm
by PeacefulAnarchy
airdolll wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 7:59 pm
Tim2460 wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 6:05 am Why not... But your example is not the best : 1 2 3 movies will get the same point as the ranked 3 + group behind.
Out Java tools can't handle group ranking yet... So it's manual computing... The more complicated it gets... The more possibility of error rising.
I don't think I understand it, sorry. Wouldn't it be like:
#1 - 100 pts
#2 - 99 pts
#3 - 98 pts
#4 - 94 pts
...
#10 - 94 pts

?

In any case, I wouldn't want to make it troublesome for you if it's a lot of extra work, so I might just make a group-ranked list with less groups or a partially ranked one
Yes you can do that, Tim's point is that a group of 1 is not a group, so computationally it makes no difference and writing it that way just risks confusion.
If you want
1
2
3
4-10
Then just say Top3 ranked and 4-10 grouped.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 22nd, 2022, 10:48 pm
by airdolll
PeacefulAnarchy wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 10:10 pm
airdolll wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 7:59 pm
Tim2460 wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 6:05 am Why not... But your example is not the best : 1 2 3 movies will get the same point as the ranked 3 + group behind.
Out Java tools can't handle group ranking yet... So it's manual computing... The more complicated it gets... The more possibility of error rising.
I don't think I understand it, sorry. Wouldn't it be like:
#1 - 100 pts
#2 - 99 pts
#3 - 98 pts
#4 - 94 pts
...
#10 - 94 pts

?

In any case, I wouldn't want to make it troublesome for you if it's a lot of extra work, so I might just make a group-ranked list with less groups or a partially ranked one
Yes you can do that, Tim's point is that a group of 1 is not a group, so computationally it makes no difference and writing it that way just risks confusion.
If you want
1
2
3
4-10
Then just say Top3 ranked and 4-10 grouped.
Ah, got it! Thanks a lot.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 23rd, 2022, 9:47 am
by Tim2460
PeacefulAnarchy wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 10:10 pm
airdolll wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 7:59 pm
Tim2460 wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 6:05 am Why not... But your example is not the best : 1 2 3 movies will get the same point as the ranked 3 + group behind.
Out Java tools can't handle group ranking yet... So it's manual computing... The more complicated it gets... The more possibility of error rising.
I don't think I understand it, sorry. Wouldn't it be like:
#1 - 100 pts
#2 - 99 pts
#3 - 98 pts
#4 - 94 pts
...
#10 - 94 pts

?

In any case, I wouldn't want to make it troublesome for you if it's a lot of extra work, so I might just make a group-ranked list with less groups or a partially ranked one
Yes you can do that, Tim's point is that a group of 1 is not a group, so computationally it makes no difference and writing it that way just risks confusion.
If you want
1
2
3
4-10
Then just say Top3 ranked and 4-10 grouped.
Thx PA : you explained it better than me ;) (l)

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 23rd, 2022, 11:18 am
by Captain_Zimmermann

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 23rd, 2022, 12:33 pm
by Tim2460
Updated @ 65

NB Voter Mode URL Count
001 mathiasa Ranked mathiasa (463) 448
002 rokp Ranked rokp (64) 61
003 beavis Unanked beavis (Unanked) 500
004 sol Ranked sol (500) 500
005 TraverseTown Ranked TraverseTown (640) 640
006 72aicm Ranked 250 72aicm (Ranked 250) 444
007 toromash Ranked toromash (193) 193
008 frbrown Ranked frbrown (446) 446
009 Mysterious Dude Ranked Mysterious Dude (220) 220
010 Traveller Ranked Traveller (200) 200
011 RolandKirkSunglasses Ranked RolandKirkSunglasses (125) 125
012 shugs Ranked shugs (54) 54
013 Lilarcor Ranked Lilarcor (485) 485
014 zzzorf Ranked zzzorf (500) 500
015 St. Gloede Ranked St. Gloede (714) 714
016 Gorro Ranked Gorro (500) 500
017 Perception de Ambiguity Ranked Perception de Ambiguity (8404) 8404
018 peeptoad Ranked 6 peeptoad (Ranked 6) 205
019 cinewest Ranked cinewest (199) 199
020 DudeLanez Unanked DudeLanez (Unanked) 182
021 murnaunosferatu Ranked murnaunosferatu (140) 140
022 blocho Unranked blocho (Unranked) 165
023 gunnar Group Ranked gunnar (Group Ranked) 364
024 Arkantos Ranked Arkantos (21) 21
025 GruesomeTwosome Ranked GruesomeTwosome (136) 136
026 sortile9io Ranked sortile9io (246) 246
027 Gordon_Gekko Ranked Gordon_Gekko (236) 236
028 filmbantha Ranked filmbantha (546) 546
029 Torgo Ranked Torgo (224) 224
030 dirty_score Ranked dirty_score (195) 195
031 klaus78 Ranked klaus78 (275) 275
032 Gershwin Ranked Gershwin (201) 201
033 cinephage Ranked cinephage (297) 297
034 zuma Ranked zuma (200) 200
035 beasterne Ranked beasterne (108) 108
036 Onderhond Ranked Onderhond (513) 513
037 Teproc Ranked 100 Teproc (Ranked 100) 183
038 AdamH Ranked AdamH (197) 197
039 joachimt Ranked joachimt (452) 452
040 Wonderful Rainbow Ranked Wonderful Rainbow (145) 145
041 russa03 Ranked russa03 (202) 202
042 pitchorneirda Group Ranked pitchorneirda (Group Ranked) 142
043 Lonewolf2003 Ranked 150 Lonewolf2003 (Ranked 150) 277
044 mightysparks Ranked mightysparks (177) 177
045 mjf314 Ranked mjf314 (174) 174
046 Caracortada Ranked Caracortada (126) 126
047 rnilsson19 Ranked rnilsson19 (455) 455
048 itsirc Unranked itsirc (Unranked) 61
049 Angel Glez Ranked 378 Angel Glez (Ranked 378) 549
050 flavo5000 unranked flavo5000 (unranked) 246
051 Mifune Ranked Mifune (120) 120
052 vortexsurfer Ranked vortexsurfer (250) 250
053 Apu Ranked Apu (182) 182
054 jeff_v Ranked jeff_v (288) 288
055 Melvelet Ranked Melvelet (238) 238
056 paul281f Ranked 60 paul281f (Ranked 60) 202
057 Lammetje Ranked Lammetje (52) 52
058 ororama Ranked ororama (264) 264
059 Marazmatique Ranked Marazmatique (92) 92
060 jlfitz unranked jlfitz (unranked) 500
061 1SO Ranked 1SO (199) 199
062 BaalMan Ranked BaalMan (201) 201
063 Rufus-T Ranked Rufus-T (100) 100
064 cayh Ranked cayh (228) 228
065 Captain_Zimmermann Ranked Captain_Zimmermann (68) 68

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 24th, 2022, 9:13 am
by Smoover

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 24th, 2022, 4:53 pm
by 3eyes
arrgh, I started editing the last one and when I tried to delete the ones that no longer qualified it deleted the whole list. I may or may not manage a new edition. Stay tuned. (I don't suppose the last one I posted is still accessible here?)

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 24th, 2022, 5:22 pm
by gunnar
3eyes wrote: September 24th, 2022, 4:53 pm arrgh, I started editing the last one and when I tried to delete the ones that no longer qualified it deleted the whole list. I may or may not manage a new edition. Stay tuned. (I don't suppose the last one I posted is still accessible here?)
Your IMDb list from 2019 still seems to be available: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls063864488/. You could edit that one or import it to ICM and then edit it if that would help.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 24th, 2022, 5:36 pm
by Tim2460
Again I'll be able to handle the above 400 few films if you left some... No worry

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 2:14 am
by amechsner

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 8:23 am
by gromit82
Here's my ballot:
https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/icm+ ... /gromit82/

Top 40 ranked, the rest unranked.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 9:09 am
by Tim2460
Last Week to post your list. I'll start PM-ing the ones that forgot soon ,)

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 9:11 am
by hurluberlu
My list
Ranked

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 12:48 pm
by AdamH
I think that's 69 lists now? 55 more needed to equal last year but there's always a lot of late lists.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 1:52 pm
by AdamH
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 9:09 am Last Week to post your list. I'll start PM-ing the ones that forgot soon ,)
Have you submitted a list yet?

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 2:12 pm
by matthewscott8

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 2:13 pm
by matthewscott8
AdamH wrote: Yesterday, 12:48 pm I think that's 69 lists now? 55 more needed to equal last year but there's always a lot of late lists.
Can make sense to wait to vote with this one due to films having more chance of going over 400 the earlier the ballot.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 2:17 pm
by clemmetarey
Thanks for the message Adam, I would have missed it otherwise

https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/clem ... emmetarey/

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 3:59 pm
by AdamH
matthewscott8 wrote: Yesterday, 2:13 pm
AdamH wrote: Yesterday, 12:48 pm I think that's 69 lists now? 55 more needed to equal last year but there's always a lot of late lists.
Can make sense to wait to vote with this one due to films having more chance of going over 400 the earlier the ballot.
Perhaps but the films get automatically removed anyway so no need to worry about.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 4:57 pm
by matthewscott8
Btw is a ruling needed on Fanny and Alexander? I generated my list simply by sieving my favourites list mechanically (with a few manual adjustments near the end of the list, as can happen when you note the exclusions of a fairly arbitrary cutoff line), and now note that I have the TV / long version of F&A at #2. It seems to fit within the rules, but I wondered how many other people have taken this route, as presumably it's very well regarded, but not already in the 500 < 400.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 5:21 pm
by Torgo
Just pick another title, there are enough to choose from. You yourself should be ashamed the most to give your precious #2 spot to a film more renowned than the rest of the list combined. :P ;)
I mean we all know it's only eligible because of some clunky IMDb process, every Fanny edition will have been watched by 1000+ people.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 5:25 pm
by OldAle1
Torgo wrote: Yesterday, 5:21 pm Just pick another title, there are enough to choose from. You yourself should be ashamed the most to give your precious #2 spot to a film more renowned than the rest of the list combined. :P ;)
I mean we all know it's only eligible because of some clunky IMDb process, every Fanny edition will have been watched by 1000+ people.
:cheers:

Yeah, weird ratings/numbers caused by films being listed twice really shouldn't be a reason to vote for something so famous. Also there's the fact that IMDb is so completely arbitrary when it comes to counting mini-series/film version of those mini-series separately - or not. And then icm follow up this erratic behavior of course.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 5:33 pm
by Harco
Thanks, Adam, for the reminder!

https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/harc ... 400/harco/

Ranked in three groups:

001-005: 5*.
006-030: 4*.
031-155: 3*.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 6:16 pm
by matthewscott8
OldAle1 wrote: Yesterday, 5:25 pm
Torgo wrote: Yesterday, 5:21 pm Just pick another title, there are enough to choose from. You yourself should be ashamed the most to give your precious #2 spot to a film more renowned than the rest of the list combined. :P ;)
I mean we all know it's only eligible because of some clunky IMDb process, every Fanny edition will have been watched by 1000+ people.
:cheers:

Yeah, weird ratings/numbers caused by films being listed twice really shouldn't be a reason to vote for something so famous. Also there's the fact that IMDb is so completely arbitrary when it comes to counting mini-series/film version of those mini-series separately - or not. And then icm follow up this erratic behavior of course.
This one doesn't feel so arbitrary, as it has an entire two hours more footage. Also I am not super convinced that people have in fact seen it in this long form. In other ICM polls it has been given a separate entry I believe.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 6:21 pm
by Torgo
Oh I'm fully convinced. The new entry even had less than 20 checks in 2018. You wouldn't have believed that either, right?
:)
It just emerged way past ICM's prime. You can assume it would have gained (more than) a mere 100 checks more in the 8 years since the site's birth, had it been featured correctly on the Criterion list from the beginning.

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 6:58 pm
by monclivie

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 8:10 pm
by Tim2460
AdamH wrote: Yesterday, 1:52 pm
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 9:09 am Last Week to post your list. I'll start PM-ing the ones that forgot soon ,)
Have you submitted a list yet?
Hmmm I don't think I haver submitted an list for 400<500... Maybe I will!
Anyway thanks for the mass pm!

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 8:16 pm
by Torgo
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 8:10 pm
AdamH wrote: Yesterday, 1:52 pm
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 9:09 am Last Week to post your list. I'll start PM-ing the ones that forgot soon ,)
Have you submitted a list yet?
Hmmm I don't think I haver submitted an list for 400<500... Maybe I will!
wtf. What a sick twist to the whole story that is. :folded:

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 8:23 pm
by AdamH
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 8:10 pm
AdamH wrote: Yesterday, 1:52 pm
Tim2460 wrote: Yesterday, 9:09 am Last Week to post your list. I'll start PM-ing the ones that forgot soon ,)
Have you submitted a list yet?
Hmmm I don't think I haver submitted an list for 400<500... Maybe I will!
Anyway thanks for the mass pm!
Wow. The person posting about the lists and talking about messaging everyone hasn't posted a list themselves? What on earth is going on? :P

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 25th, 2022, 10:05 pm
by AHALE80

Re: ICM Forum's 500<400 : 2022 Edition : Nomination Thread (Due Oct-03)

Posted: September 26th, 2022, 1:47 am
by gunnar
gunnar wrote: August 23rd, 2022, 5:40 am Group Ranked
Group 1 #1-2
Group 2 #3-20
Group 3 #21-39
Group 4 #40-75
Group 5 #76-109
Group 6 #110-321
Group 7 #322-364

https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/unde ... /kaculler/

I think a half-life of 75 makes sense if it is something that would be considered.
I added a few films to my list so here are the new groups:

Group Ranked
Group 1 #1-2
Group 2 #3-21
Group 3 #22-40
Group 4 #41-77
Group 5 #78-112
Group 6 #113-328
Group 7 #329-371

https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/unde ... /kaculler/