Well, he gave a deadline for the poll but not for the results report.Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 04:57:50 AM wrote:Joachim is srsly pulling our legs here. He's even checked After Earth in the meantime. At least it's not Battlefield Earth.

Well, he gave a deadline for the poll but not for the results report.Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 04:57:50 AM wrote:Joachim is srsly pulling our legs here. He's even checked After Earth in the meantime. At least it's not Battlefield Earth.
That's something to remember for the futuresortile9io on Oct 28 2017, 05:18:59 AM wrote:Well, he gave a deadline for the poll but not for the results report.Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 04:57:50 AM wrote:Joachim is srsly pulling our legs here. He's even checked After Earth in the meantime. At least it's not Battlefield Earth.
![]()
Life isn’t always fair. C'est la vie. Some have luck, some don’t. It’s a freaking game on an Internet forum. Let’s pick one and get this over with.Nathan Treadway on Oct 28 2017, 04:08:01 AM wrote:All those suggestions assume that there is a tie, which there very well may not be. Every option presents problems.
Flipping a coin is pure coincidence. Would it be fair to the loser?
Picking the country with the most 5s also means you chose the country with the most 1s.
Going with a playoff means that they have to potentially find another film that falls within the criteria. It also makes the tournament probably unnecessarily longer.
Running another poll is, well.. Running another poll.
Maybe another poll to decide which way to go. LOL. And watch, all this will be for naught
Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 04:57:50 AM wrote:Joachim is srsly pulling our legs here. He's even checked After Earth in the meantime. At least it's not Battlefield Earth.
I think you're Tarris because he's very often present here, but never comments. That's your spare account, admit it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 06:15:52 AM wrote:Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 04:57:50 AM wrote:Joachim is srsly pulling our legs here. He's even checked After Earth in the meantime. At least it's not Battlefield Earth.![]()
![]()
![]()
(still reading the rest that has been said during my absence)
I won't vote. If it's a tie, my vote picks the winner.72allinncallme on Oct 28 2017, 06:28:32 AM wrote:So hoping for another tie.![]()
I gave Australia a 1, cause although geographically it’s located somewhere else, culturally it’s basically another English speaking Western country. And it participated in every cup before.Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 06:36:39 AM wrote:Thanks, you've made the best decisions, other than the whole let's wait 17 hours thing![]()
Pity the head-to-head didnt work out.
So what I think of results:
Burkina Faso features after all, it and Mali share I think their best director, so it'll be weird if both countries pick a movie by the same director.
Australia was fighting for its spot, a bit surprising.
I called Puerto Rico haha even though me and other people gave it high points.
And yay, Lebanon totally rocked the competition, I would have expected it a bit, but only a bit lower. But that is less than 0.1 average point, so phew!
I vote Malaysia, of course.
There's some Aboriginal films there to pick, I expectLonewolf2003 on Oct 28 2017, 06:41:21 AM wrote:I gave Australia a 1, cause although geographically it’s located somewhere else, culturally it’s basically another English speaking Western country.
i gave Australia a 1. No offense there. I am just not so much interested in english spoken movies at the world cupArmoreska on Oct 28 2017, 06:36:39 AM wrote:Australia was fighting for its spot, a bit surprising.
Voting is not mandatory.monty on Oct 28 2017, 07:04:33 AM wrote:Don't care for either option.
Tajikistan (clemmetarey)sortile9io on Oct 28 2017, 07:43:59 AM wrote:Who are the managers of the excluded countries?
No national pride? Well I can relate.monty on Oct 28 2017, 07:04:33 AM wrote:Don't care for either option.
Norway should be a country of sporadic presence, not always there but neither absent too many times.Armoreska on Oct 28 2017, 08:55:50 AM wrote:No national pride? Well I can relate.monty on Oct 28 2017, 07:04:33 AM wrote:Don't care for either option.
A 2 point lead it still is.
If Norway wins, I'll just replace two, three or four countries and that's it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 09:55:31 AM wrote:What is the reason for this division in pots, Mario? Did you just groups them by rough quality? I haven't looked into the pots closely, but the best idea I've read so far was:
1. best of Europe
2. least of Europe
3. best of rest of the world
4. least of rest of the world.
What if Norway wins the poll? I don't think it belong to pot 4 in the place of Malaysia.
Pretend Georgia is not in Europe and put it in pot 4 and Norway in Pot3.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 09:55:31 AM wrote:What is the reason for this division in pots, Mario? Did you just groups them by rough quality? I haven't looked into the pots closely, but the best idea I've read so far was:
1. best of Europe
2. least of Europe
3. best of rest of the world
4. least of rest of the world.
What if Norway wins the poll? I don't think it belong to pot 4 in the place of Malaysia.
Here we gojoachimt on Oct 28 2017, 06:32:15 AM wrote:Here are the 8 countries that have entered the tournament with their managers:
Burkina Faso (hurluberlu )
Most of the films from the region are coproductions so there could be some debate but let's wait and see.Armoreska on wrote: So what I think of results:
Burkina Faso features after all, it and Mali share I think their best director, so it'll be weird if both countries pick a movie by the same director.
End of December.RogerTheMovieManiac88 on Oct 28 2017, 10:36:27 AM wrote:I vote for Norway.
How long do managers have to decide on an opening film? Just so that I have some idea. Been mulling over plenty of Latvian options.
I don't see any problem with France and Japan in one group the first round (for example). There are two countries proceeding per group. Tough luck for the other two then.Mario Gaborović on Oct 28 2017, 10:05:50 AM wrote:If Norway wins, I'll just replace two, three or four countries and that's it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 09:55:31 AM wrote:What is the reason for this division in pots, Mario? Did you just groups them by rough quality? I haven't looked into the pots closely, but the best idea I've read so far was:
1. best of Europe
2. least of Europe
3. best of rest of the world
4. least of rest of the world.
What if Norway wins the poll? I don't think it belong to pot 4 in the place of Malaysia.
The idea I previously had (the one you posted) was mine, but I felt people would object the possibility of France and Japan (or France and USA, or Italy and Japan, or Italy and USA) being in the same group at the very start, so I conceived another system.
Yet thinking more about it, it's the other two of that possible group which would have trouble on their shoulders.
But it takes no effort to avoid it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 10:55:55 AM wrote:I don't see any problem with France and Japan in one group the first round (for example). There are two countries proceeding per group. Tough luck for the other two then.Mario Gaborović on Oct 28 2017, 10:05:50 AM wrote:If Norway wins, I'll just replace two, three or four countries and that's it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 09:55:31 AM wrote:What is the reason for this division in pots, Mario? Did you just groups them by rough quality? I haven't looked into the pots closely, but the best idea I've read so far was:
1. best of Europe
2. least of Europe
3. best of rest of the world
4. least of rest of the world.
What if Norway wins the poll? I don't think it belong to pot 4 in the place of Malaysia.
The idea I previously had (the one you posted) was mine, but I felt people would object the possibility of France and Japan (or France and USA, or Italy and Japan, or Italy and USA) being in the same group at the very start, so I conceived another system.
Yet thinking more about it, it's the other two of that possible group which would have trouble on their shoulders.
To avoid it, we would simply divide the countries into tier 1 to tier 4, no matter what region they're from.PeacefulAnarchy on Oct 28 2017, 10:58:56 AM wrote:But it takes no effort to avoid it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 10:55:55 AM wrote:I don't see any problem with France and Japan in one group the first round (for example). There are two countries proceeding per group. Tough luck for the other two then.Mario Gaborović on Oct 28 2017, 10:05:50 AM wrote:If Norway wins, I'll just replace two, three or four countries and that's it.
The idea I previously had (the one you posted) was mine, but I felt people would object the possibility of France and Japan (or France and USA, or Italy and Japan, or Italy and USA) being in the same group at the very start, so I conceived another system.
Yet thinking more about it, it's the other two of that possible group which would have trouble on their shoulders.
But the point is you can do both. Ensure exactly two European countries per group and ensure that the tippy top Euro countries aren't matched up against the tippy top rest of the world countries.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 11:01:01 AM wrote:To avoid it, we would simply divide the countries into tier 1 to tier 4, no matter what region they're from.PeacefulAnarchy on Oct 28 2017, 10:58:56 AM wrote:But it takes no effort to avoid it.joachimt on Oct 28 2017, 10:55:55 AM wrote:I don't see any problem with France and Japan in one group the first round (for example). There are two countries proceeding per group. Tough luck for the other two then.