Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
ICMForum's Favourite Movies 2019 Edition (Results)
Polls: Children (Results), 1932 (Closed?), 1989 awards (Apr 22nd), Directed by women (Apr 23rd), DtC Voting (Apr 25th)
Challenges: DtC noms, Aus-NZ-Oceania, 1940s
Film of the Week: Alexandra's Project, May nominations (Apr 26th)

Nachts, wenn der Teufel kam AKA The Devil Strikes at Night (1957) Film of the Week #267

Post Reply
User avatar
Cocoa
Donator
Posts: 1379
Joined: Jul 17, 2013
Location: Chicago, USA
Contact:

Nachts, wenn der Teufel kam AKA The Devil Strikes at Night (1957) Film of the Week #267

#1

Post by Cocoa » February 10th, 2019, 2:45 pm

Film of the Week #267: Nachts, wenn der Teufel kam AKA The Devil Strikes at Night (1957)

Image

Summary:
A serial killer strikes again during WWII in Germany. The wrong man is arrested and a detective hunts down the real killer. But justice in Nazi Germany is not so easily administered.

Info/Links:
#432 on 500<400, with 165 checks.
Nominated by Cocoa and joachimt.
On IMDb
On iCM

From the 500<400 resultsShow
#432(NEW) Nachts, wenn der Teufel kam (1957)
[The Devil Strikes at Night]

Image
Directed by: Robert Siodmak
(298.52 Pts, 14 Votes) , Top 1–10–50: 0–0–0
History: 432561398572389←414
ICheckMovies: 161 Checks , 13 Favourites , 3 Official lists
List of Voters:Show
VVKT (52)
HVM (59)
bjornam (64)
AdamH (78)
brokenface (109)
mjf314 (110)
burneyfan (115)
Angel Glez (123)
sol (125)
klaus78 (134)
72allinncallme (NA)
Kasparius (261)
St. Gloede (343)
bal3x (391)

This movie fits the current Academy Awards Challenge.



Here is a schedule of all the FotWs.

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 5183
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#2

Post by maxwelldeux » February 16th, 2019, 7:02 am

Mean to watch this earlier this week, but better late than never?

Anyway, I can't lie - I was pretty underwhelmed by it. It was fine - but it felt more like a run-of-the-mill film noir b-movie to me than anything else. The visuals were fine. The story was fine, but not all that compelling. I didn't feel the tension or intrigue or mystery from it. Not that it was bad - just "meh." The last 15 minutes or so made it a bit more interesting, but even that felt like more of a side plot than anything else.

User avatar
joachimt
Donator
Posts: 27987
Joined: Feb 16, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

#3

Post by joachimt » February 16th, 2019, 8:55 pm

Just watched it. I agree with Max. 6/10
ICM-profile
Fergenaprido: "I find your OCD to be adorable, J"

User avatar
Cocoa
Donator
Posts: 1379
Joined: Jul 17, 2013
Location: Chicago, USA
Contact:

#4

Post by Cocoa » February 16th, 2019, 8:58 pm

I was expecting more from the movie as well. My takeaway is that Schnapps gives you wings. 6/10

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 5183
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#5

Post by maxwelldeux » February 16th, 2019, 9:05 pm

Cocoa wrote:
February 16th, 2019, 8:58 pm
I was expecting more from the movie as well. My takeaway is that Schnapps gives you wings. 6/10
The makers of Red Bull must have watched this one...

blocho
Donator
Posts: 1494
Joined: Jul 20, 2014
Contact:

#6

Post by blocho » February 17th, 2019, 8:42 am

I also agree with Max's assessment

User avatar
joachimt
Donator
Posts: 27987
Joined: Feb 16, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

#7

Post by joachimt » February 17th, 2019, 3:20 pm

And yet again we proof that we suck in having a decent movie discussion. :lol:
ICM-profile
Fergenaprido: "I find your OCD to be adorable, J"

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 5183
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#8

Post by maxwelldeux » February 17th, 2019, 6:24 pm

joachimt wrote:
February 17th, 2019, 3:20 pm
And yet again we proof that we suck in having a decent movie discussion. :lol:
I'm just glad people agree with me. B)

Post Reply