Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
Podcast: Talking Images (Episode 11 released July 24th)
Polls: 0 Official Lists (Results), 1960 (Aug 9th), Romance (Aug 28th)
Challenges: German/Austrian/Swiss, <400, 1970s
Film of the Week: Sibiriada, September nominations (Aug 28th)
World Cup S4: Match 2G: Russia vs Portugal (Aug 6th), Match 2H: India vs Cuba (Aug 16th), QF Preparation (Aug 25th)

Future challenges

Post Reply
User avatar
Melvelet
Posts: 2089
Joined: Mar 29, 2013
Contact:

Re: Future challenges

#2921

Post by Melvelet » July 30th, 2020, 12:35 pm

No, I meant having a recommendation-based bonus challenge (basically the 1>500<400 challenge that we used to have) as I suggested a couple of posts above

User avatar
flavo5000
Posts: 3297
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Location: Arkansas, USA
Contact:

#2922

Post by flavo5000 » July 30th, 2020, 1:23 pm

Melvelet wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 11:34 am
Okay cool :) Does anybody have an objection against including 1>500<400 in the <400 checks challenge?
I say have at it. Especially if when people nominate a film, they describe why they like it.

User avatar
sol
Donator
Posts: 9088
Joined: Feb 03, 2017
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#2923

Post by sol » July 30th, 2020, 1:45 pm

flavo5000 wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:23 pm
Melvelet wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 11:34 am
Okay cool :) Does anybody have an objection against including 1>500<400 in the <400 checks challenge?
I say have at it. Especially if when people nominate a film, they describe why they like it.
Doesn't matter. Nobody will watch my top pick anyway. :hmph:
Former IMDb message boards user // iCM | IMDb | Letterboxd | My top 750 films // Long live the new flesh!
Image Image Image

User avatar
flavo5000
Posts: 3297
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Location: Arkansas, USA
Contact:

#2924

Post by flavo5000 » July 30th, 2020, 6:21 pm

sol wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:45 pm
flavo5000 wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:23 pm
Melvelet wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 11:34 am
Okay cool :) Does anybody have an objection against including 1>500<400 in the <400 checks challenge?
I say have at it. Especially if when people nominate a film, they describe why they like it.
Doesn't matter. Nobody will watch my top pick anyway. :hmph:
The only way to guarantee failure is to never try to begin with. :D

User avatar
peeptoad
Posts: 2120
Joined: Feb 04, 2017
Contact:

#2925

Post by peeptoad » July 30th, 2020, 6:38 pm

flavo5000 wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 6:21 pm
sol wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:45 pm
flavo5000 wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:23 pm


I say have at it. Especially if when people nominate a film, they describe why they like it.
Doesn't matter. Nobody will watch my top pick anyway. :hmph:
The only way to guarantee failure is to never try to begin with. :D
That's got Homer Simpson written all over it...

psychotronicbeatnik
Donator
Posts: 1775
Joined: Feb 04, 2017
Location: Oregon
Contact:

#2926

Post by psychotronicbeatnik » July 31st, 2020, 10:00 pm

peeptoad wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 6:38 pm
flavo5000 wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 6:21 pm
sol wrote:
July 30th, 2020, 1:45 pm
Doesn't matter. Nobody will watch my top pick anyway. :hmph:
The only way to guarantee failure is to never try to begin with. :D
That's got Homer Simpson written all over it...
Or Yogi Berra...

Post Reply