This is our new forum, if you have questions see THIS THREAD
If you had an account we've reset the password, click the "I forgot my password" link on the login page and check your spam. If you still have trouble go to the old forum and check your PMs or make a post for help, or send an email to Admin@icmforum.com
Thank you to everyone who donated to our fundraiser: https://fundrazr.com/01Mtqd for helping make this happen.
500<400 2018 Update (Results)
Polls: 1991 (Results), Germany (Oct 20th), 1946 awards (Oct 23rd), Horror (Oct 31st)
Challenges: Horror, LGBTIQ+, Iberian Countries
World Cup: Round 2 schedule, Match 2D (Oct 21st), Match 2E (Nov 4th)
Film of the Week: À Flor do Mar

<400 Challenge - Official August 2018

Post Reply
User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

<400 Challenge - Official August 2018

#1

Post by maxwelldeux » July 28th, 2018, 8:30 pm

<400 Checks Challenge

Image

Goal:
Watch as many films with fewer than 400 checks on ICM as you can!

Challenge runs 1 August 2018 - 31 August 2018.

Rules:
- Rewatches allowed.
- A feature film (at least 40 min) counts as one entry.
- A total of 60 minutes of short films count as one entry.
- To qualify for the challenge, you must list the number of checks the film has. 399 or fewer, including your check, qualifies. Films with 400+ checks are ineligible.
- Individual episodes are ineligible.
- Mini-series and TV series may be counted if watched in their entirety, but not individual episodes.
Why are episodes excluded?Show
This is because ICM does not really encourage checking of individual episodes. For example, the most checked Friends episode has 228 checks; the series itself has over 12000 checks. So we're closing that loophole to keep the focus on discovering new underseen gems.

PS: If you want to have fun and check out a weird ICM quirk, go to the Friends (1994) series page. Or search for it with the ID: tt0108778

Stats & Formatting:
- Title (year) #Checks is the preferred format (Include your check in the total)
- New posts are preferred over edited posts
- I'll be tracking years and checks with this challenge
- Link to ICM import: https://beta.icheckmovies.com/import/movies/

Side Challenge: The Ultra-Obscurity Challenge!
Goal: Watch films with the fewest checks possible - the person with the lowest average number of checks on films watched wins!

Scoring: I'm going to use an Adjusted Average; this to account for averages based on small sample sizes (e.g., should a person who watches only one film, but was the first person to check it, win?). Basically, everyone starts out with five watches with 400 checks each (this only applies to the scoring for the side challenge). Each time you watch a film, your average is recalculated based on those 5 watches with 400 checks, plus the check counts for whatever films you've watched for this challenge. Note that shorts and features will be treated equally for this side challenge.
Example MathShow
(Remember, 400 + 400 + 400 + 4000 + 400 = 5*400 = 2000)

Example 1a: ABC has watched their first film, and was the 50th check on it.

(2000 + 50)/(5 + 1) = 2050/6 = 341.67

Example 1b: DEF has watched 20 films, and was the 325th check on all twenty of them.

[2000 + (325*20)]/(5 + 20) = 8500/25 = 340

So DEF is currently in the lead, but only just barely. ABC watching a more obscure film, but only one versus twenty for DEF.

Example 2a: ABC has watched a second film, and was the 10th check on it.

(2000 + 50 +10)/(5 + 2) = 2060/7 = 294.29

Example 2b: DEF has watched another 20 films, and was the 300th check on all twenty in this batch.

[2000 + (325*20) + (300*20)]/(5 + 20 + 20) = 14500/45 = 322.22

So ABC is now leading, despite only watching two films, because the films had very few checks. DEF just isn't watching obscure enough films to stay in the lead.
Nerd TalkShow
Using a Bayesian Average, with m=400 and c=5.

Side Challenge LeaderboardShow
Adjusted Average Participant Average Checks Number of Watches
31.32 PUNQ 3.81 67
32.28 jdidaco 17.33 123
46.27 te18 7.83 46
53.24 RogerTheMovieManiac88 31.56 80
54.20 albajos 41.85 140
65.33 ChrisReynolds 42.41 73
65.38 3eyes 16.18 34
82.15 allisoncm 62.04 79
92.09 maxwelldeux 60.02 48
94.09 ororama 65.23 53
94.69 hurluberlu 79.27 99
96.00 VincentPrice 62.96 46
96.98 psychotronicbeatnik 80.69 93
101.40 OldAle1 77.32 62
103.56 Mate_cosido 73.92 50
110.22 RBG 69.97 36
111.48 XxXApathy420XxX 45.91 22
120.33 edward5 91.80 49
128.12 sushantv10 113.51 93
136.38 blueboybob 117.00 68
138.82 Fergenaprido 92.18 28
142.17 Ivan0716 125.21 76
146.53 Knaldskalle 56.00 14
149.12 vortexsurfer 116.11 38
149.58 clemmetarey 83.68 19
154.03 zzzorf 110.11 28
157.41 flavo5000 150.10 166
158.42 frbrown 72.14 14
169.17 funkybusiness 4.29 7
181.44 Lilarcor 97.38 13
183.07 sebby 139.68 25
188.55 sol 171.50 62
198.87 Lonewolf2003 143.00 18
204.35 klaus78 176.40 35
208.44 nimimerkillinen 180.26 34
209.89 tommy_leazaq 136.77 13
213.82 72allinncallme 190.55 40
218.40 filmbantha 157.87 15
223.14 cinephage 167.88 16
233.18 Hippiemans 184.12 17
244.68 flaiky 205.85 20
251.95 weirdboy 239.41 59
255.82 Hunziker 195.75 12
259.36 mathiasa 142.17 6
278.25 connordenney 75.33 3
281.10 Lakigigar 162.20 5
284.73 blocho 188.67 6
290.72 Tarris1 248.69 13
391.33 shugs 348.00 1

Official Lists:
ICM Forum's 500<400
(But check eligibility - 41 films are currently ineligible. When you sort by checks (i.e., above link), everything Asphalt (1929) and above has at least 400 checks.)

Participants:
Rank Participant Count
1 albajos 140
2 flavo5000 132
3 sushantv10 88
4 psychotronicbeatnik 84
5 jdidaco 82
6 allisoncm 77
6 hurluberlu 77
8 Ivan0716 76
9 RogerTheMovieManiac88 75
10 blueboybob 68
11 PUNQ 67
12 sol 58
13 weirdboy 52
14 Mate_cosido 50
15 edward5 49
16 maxwelldeux 46
16 VincentPrice 46
18 OldAle1 45
19 72allinncallme 40
19 ChrisReynolds 40
21 vortexsurfer 37
22 klaus78 35
23 zzzorf 28
23 3eyes 28
25 nimimerkillinen 27
26 sebby 25
27 Fergenaprido 22
28 RBG 20
28 te18 20
28 flaiky 20
28 ororama 20
32 clemmetarey 19
33 Lonewolf2003 18
34 cinephage 16
35 filmbantha 15
36 XxXApathy420XxX 14
36 frbrown 14
36 Knaldskalle 14
39 Tarris1 13
39 tommy_leazaq 13
39 Hippiemans 13
42 Lilarcor 8
43 mathiasa 6
43 Hunziker 6
43 blocho 6
46 Lakigigar 5
47 funkybusiness 3
47 connordenney 3
49 shugs 1


Fun Stats:
Week 1 Stats and Challenge Update: viewtopic.php?p=526443#p526443
Week 2 Stats and Challenge Update: viewtopic.php?p=527516#p527516
Week 3 Stats and Challenge Update: viewtopic.php?p=528779#p528779
Final Stats and Challenge Update: viewtopic.php?p=531140#p531140
Last edited by maxwelldeux on September 3rd, 2018, 6:59 pm, edited 39 times in total.

User avatar
blueboybob
Donator
Posts: 1017
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: DC
Contact:

#2

Post by blueboybob » July 28th, 2018, 8:51 pm

Just to be clear, they don't have to be official checks correct?

This challenge may fit into my plans for next month...

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#3

Post by maxwelldeux » July 28th, 2018, 9:14 pm

blueboybob wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 8:51 pm
Just to be clear, they don't have to be official checks correct?

This challenge may fit into my plans for next month...
Correct - any film, unofficial or official, on any list or none at all, is eligible, as long as it has fewer than 400 checks.

User avatar
Lilarcor
Donator
Posts: 2657
Joined: Jun 14, 2011
Contact:

#4

Post by Lilarcor » July 28th, 2018, 9:29 pm

Says July in the thread title, just a heads up.

I'm in!

User avatar
funkybusiness
Donator
Posts: 10132
Joined: Jan 22, 2013
Contact:

#5

Post by funkybusiness » July 28th, 2018, 9:55 pm

when listing titles, do you want our check included or how many checks there were when we watched it? I'm assuming the first but thought I should ask for clarification anyway.
example:
xx. Double D Nurses (1994) [1st check]
or
xx. Double D Nurses (1994) [0 checks]

(also how does Double D Nurses have 0 checks? Isn't it a clazzic?)

User avatar
Mate_cosido
Posts: 518
Joined: Apr 28, 2016
Contact:

#6

Post by Mate_cosido » July 28th, 2018, 10:14 pm

Looking at my checks from the current month i've checked 74 movies so far, from wich 67 had under 400 checks, what i'm trying to say is that i'm definetely in.

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 18132
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#7

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » July 28th, 2018, 10:28 pm

The average film I see has less than 400 checks so I might as well join.

User avatar
VincentPrice
Posts: 3597
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Maine
Contact:

#8

Post by VincentPrice » July 28th, 2018, 10:38 pm

Yep, been stocking up on some random TCM flicks to go towards this challenge.

User avatar
flaiky
Posts: 842
Joined: Feb 04, 2017
Location: London UK
Contact:

#9

Post by flaiky » July 28th, 2018, 11:03 pm

Mmmmm, prawns. This is a cool challenge, I'm in.

I'm not worried about the bonus challenge, but you'd like us to list the check-count anyway I take it?

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#10

Post by maxwelldeux » July 28th, 2018, 11:34 pm

Lilarcor wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 9:29 pm
Says July in the thread title, just a heads up.
Oops... Fixed. Thanks!

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#11

Post by maxwelldeux » July 28th, 2018, 11:36 pm

funkybusiness wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 9:55 pm
when listing titles, do you want our check included or how many checks there were when we watched it? I'm assuming the first but thought I should ask for clarification anyway.
example:
xx. Double D Nurses (1994) [1st check]
or
xx. Double D Nurses (1994) [0 checks]

(also how does Double D Nurses have 0 checks? Isn't it a clazzic?)
Good question... the first one. Include your check in the count.

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#12

Post by maxwelldeux » July 28th, 2018, 11:44 pm

flaiky wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 11:03 pm
Mmmmm, prawns. This is a cool challenge, I'm in.

I'm not worried about the bonus challenge, but you'd like us to list the check-count anyway I take it?
Yes please! The check count helps me keep track of eligibility. And since I fully expect some films will turn ineligible during the challenge, it's really helpful for me so I don't have to look up every film every time.

weirdboy
Donator
Posts: 2865
Joined: Jan 03, 2016
Contact:

#13

Post by weirdboy » July 29th, 2018, 12:32 am

Hmmm rules say "399 checks or fewer" but image says "400 checks or less"


I will participate of course. I have 43 checks remaining to finish off the ICM Forum 500 < 400 list, so at the very least I plan to watch those.


However, I have a rather lot of work travel coming up in August which means, maybe not so much opportunity to watch movies.

User avatar
3eyes
Donator
Posts: 6147
Joined: May 17, 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

#14

Post by 3eyes » July 29th, 2018, 1:17 am

Almost all of the Middle East films on my watchlist qualify. In.
:run: STILL the Gaffer!

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#15

Post by maxwelldeux » July 29th, 2018, 4:36 am

weirdboy wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 12:32 am
Hmmm rules say "399 checks or fewer" but image says "400 checks or less"
Yeah yeah yeah - I know. But I had better images for 400. And it gave me a chance to show off my amazing photo editing skills. :cowbow:

User avatar
funkybusiness
Donator
Posts: 10132
Joined: Jan 22, 2013
Contact:

#16

Post by funkybusiness » July 29th, 2018, 4:38 am

maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:36 am
weirdboy wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 12:32 am
Hmmm rules say "399 checks or fewer" but image says "400 checks or less"
Yeah yeah yeah - I know. But I had better images for 400. And it gave me a chance to show off my amazing photo editing skills. :cowbow:
Honestly, I would be shocked if photoshopping is not your profession, maxwell. That is professional as fuck.

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#17

Post by maxwelldeux » July 29th, 2018, 5:12 am

funkybusiness wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:38 am
maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:36 am
weirdboy wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 12:32 am
Hmmm rules say "399 checks or fewer" but image says "400 checks or less"
Yeah yeah yeah - I know. But I had better images for 400. And it gave me a chance to show off my amazing photo editing skills. :cowbow:
Honestly, I would be shocked if photoshopping is not your profession, maxwell. That is professional as fuck.
Admittedly, I did have to tone it down slightly, because I was afraid people were going to try to eat their movies.

weirdboy
Donator
Posts: 2865
Joined: Jan 03, 2016
Contact:

#18

Post by weirdboy » July 29th, 2018, 5:24 am

maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:12 am
funkybusiness wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:38 am
maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:36 am


Yeah yeah yeah - I know. But I had better images for 400. And it gave me a chance to show off my amazing photo editing skills. :cowbow:
Honestly, I would be shocked if photoshopping is not your profession, maxwell. That is professional as fuck.
Admittedly, I did have to tone it down slightly, because I was afraid people were going to try to eat their movies.
Too late! If they didn't want me to eat the contents, they shouldn't put labels like "Chocolat" and "Fried Green Tomatoes" on the cover.

User avatar
funkybusiness
Donator
Posts: 10132
Joined: Jan 22, 2013
Contact:

#19

Post by funkybusiness » July 29th, 2018, 5:25 am

weirdboy wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:24 am
maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:12 am
funkybusiness wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 4:38 am

Honestly, I would be shocked if photoshopping is not your profession, maxwell. That is professional as fuck.
Admittedly, I did have to tone it down slightly, because I was afraid people were going to try to eat their movies.
Too late! If they didn't want me to eat the contents, they shouldn't put labels like "Chocolat" and "Fried Green Tomatoes" on the cover.
Ahh doesn't matter, weirdboy. Neither of those would've counted for this challenge anyway.

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#20

Post by maxwelldeux » July 29th, 2018, 6:33 am

funkybusiness wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:25 am
weirdboy wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:24 am
maxwelldeux wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 5:12 am


Admittedly, I did have to tone it down slightly, because I was afraid people were going to try to eat their movies.
Too late! If they didn't want me to eat the contents, they shouldn't put labels like "Chocolat" and "Fried Green Tomatoes" on the cover.
Ahh doesn't matter, weirdboy. Neither of those would've counted for this challenge anyway.
Then again, this concerns me... :banana:

User avatar
72allinncallme
Donator
Posts: 1637
Joined: Nov 13, 2016
Contact:

#21

Post by 72allinncallme » July 29th, 2018, 11:05 am

maxwelldeux wrote:Mini-series and TV series may be counted if watched in their entirety
One point total or * number of episodes?

The best challenge of the year, obviously in.

User avatar
hurluberlu
Donator
Posts: 954
Joined: Jan 04, 2017
Contact:

#22

Post by hurluberlu » July 29th, 2018, 11:12 am

With this and the 1990s+ challenge, August is going to be a big cleaning month for my digital TV recordings :whistling:
#JeSuisCharlie Liberté, Liberté chérie !

Image
ImageImageImageImage

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#23

Post by maxwelldeux » July 29th, 2018, 4:10 pm

72allinncallme wrote:
July 29th, 2018, 11:05 am
maxwelldeux wrote:Mini-series and TV series may be counted if watched in their entirety
One point total or * number of episodes?
One point total - otherwise, you're counting individual episodes, which are excluded. And the series page should have a check count <400.

User avatar
funkybusiness
Donator
Posts: 10132
Joined: Jan 22, 2013
Contact:

#24

Post by funkybusiness » July 30th, 2018, 9:43 am

I plan on tying in with the 90s+ challenge and going chronological, a film a year, at least for a single pass, 1990-2018. There's a tentative schedule in the spoiler below with multiple films for each year, as my interest level is mercurial at best and who knows what will appeal to me on any given day.

I've looked around at my bookmarks and picked over Arthur's favorites list, but I still had some trouble finding films that appeal to me <400 checks from 2000-2017, and 1992. so if you've got any recommendations, please.
SpoilerShow
Innisfree 1990
Siddeshwari 1990
Xi bu lai de ren 1990
The Second Circle 1990
All for the Winner 1990
Kyoto, My Mother's Place 1991
Yumeji 1991
The World According to John Coltrane 1991
The Leader, His Driver and the Driver's Wife 1991
To Lavoisier, Who Died in the Reign of Terror 1991
Naked Killer 1992
Avetik 1992
Ching se 1993
Die Rebellion 1993
Michel Foucault: Beyond Good and Evil 1993
A Confucian Confusion 1994
Youchai 1994
From Beijing with Love 1994
Hildegard of Bingen 1994
Super Citizen Ko 1995
Okaeri 1995
Mahjong 1996
Forbidden City Cop 1996
Frost 1997
Made in Hong Kong 1997
Too Many Ways to be No. 1 1997
Khrustalyov, My Car! 1998
Bullet Ballet 1998
Szenvedely 1998
Sombre 1998
Kurosawa: The Last Emperor 1999
The New Klan 1999
Abendland 1999
Un vivant qui passe 1999
As I Was Moving Ahead... 2000
Une journée d'Andrei Arsenevitch 2000
Suzhou he 2000
Pistol Opera 2001
Sobibór, 14 octobre 1943, 16 heures 2001
La vie nouvelle 2002
Tie xi qu 2002
Derrida 2003
Le pont des Arts 2004
Double Down 2005
My Name is Albert Ayler 2005
Mayak (The Lighthouse) 2006
He Fengming 2007
Un lac 2008
Let Each One Go Where He May 2009
Double Tide 2009
Le rapport Karski 2010
Two Years at Sea 2011
Autrement, la Molussie 2012
White Epilespy 2012
Perret in Frankreich und Algerien 2012
A Spell to Ward Off the Darkness 2013
Stray Dogs 2013
Maidan 2014
Natural History 2014
Kaili Blues 2015
Behemoth 2015
The Sky Trembles and the Earth is Afraid... 2015
Homo sapiens 2016
Yellow Fever 2016
The Illinois Parables 2016
Rey 2017
El mar la mar 2017
Godzilla Planet of the Monsters 2017
Streetscapes (4 films) 2017
Godzilla City on the Edge of Battle 2018
Insects 2018
The Night Eats the World 2018
Dead Souls 2018
The Absence of Apricots 2018
Djamilia 2018 (+ the 1960s film)
King Lear 2018

User avatar
albajos
Posts: 3806
Joined: May 24, 2016
Location: Norway
Contact:

#25

Post by albajos » July 30th, 2018, 11:55 am

I see I have my work set up for me to get 1 point from Coronation Street :p

User avatar
ChrisReynolds
Donator
Posts: 2148
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: London, UK
Contact:

#26

Post by ChrisReynolds » July 30th, 2018, 3:39 pm

I'll be participating in this challenge. Luckily, Frightfest is coming up at the end of this month with around 25 premieres in 5 days, so I should have a chance to do better than I usually do in these challenges.

User avatar
hurluberlu
Donator
Posts: 954
Joined: Jan 04, 2017
Contact:

#27

Post by hurluberlu » July 30th, 2018, 6:54 pm

funkybusiness wrote:
July 30th, 2018, 9:43 am
I plan on tying in with the 90s+ challenge and going chronological, a film a year, at least for a single pass, 1990-2018. There's a tentative schedule in the spoiler below with multiple films for each year, as my interest level is mercurial at best and who knows what will appeal to me on any given day.

I've looked around at my bookmarks and picked over Arthur's favorites list, but I still had some trouble finding films that appeal to me <400 checks from 2000-2017, and 1992. so if you've got any recommendations, please.
SpoilerShow
Innisfree 1990
Siddeshwari 1990
Xi bu lai de ren 1990
The Second Circle 1990
All for the Winner 1990
Kyoto, My Mother's Place 1991
Yumeji 1991
The World According to John Coltrane 1991
The Leader, His Driver and the Driver's Wife 1991
To Lavoisier, Who Died in the Reign of Terror 1991
Naked Killer 1992
Avetik 1992
Ching se 1993
Die Rebellion 1993
Michel Foucault: Beyond Good and Evil 1993
A Confucian Confusion 1994
Youchai 1994
From Beijing with Love 1994
Hildegard of Bingen 1994
Super Citizen Ko 1995
Okaeri 1995
Mahjong 1996
Forbidden City Cop 1996
Frost 1997
Made in Hong Kong 1997
Too Many Ways to be No. 1 1997
Khrustalyov, My Car! 1998
Bullet Ballet 1998
Szenvedely 1998
Sombre 1998
Kurosawa: The Last Emperor 1999
The New Klan 1999
Abendland 1999
Un vivant qui passe 1999
As I Was Moving Ahead... 2000
Une journée d'Andrei Arsenevitch 2000
Suzhou he 2000
Pistol Opera 2001
Sobibór, 14 octobre 1943, 16 heures 2001
La vie nouvelle 2002
Tie xi qu 2002
Derrida 2003
Le pont des Arts 2004
Double Down 2005
My Name is Albert Ayler 2005
Mayak (The Lighthouse) 2006
He Fengming 2007
Un lac 2008
Let Each One Go Where He May 2009
Double Tide 2009
Le rapport Karski 2010
Two Years at Sea 2011
Autrement, la Molussie 2012
White Epilespy 2012
Perret in Frankreich und Algerien 2012
A Spell to Ward Off the Darkness 2013
Stray Dogs 2013
Maidan 2014
Natural History 2014
Kaili Blues 2015
Behemoth 2015
The Sky Trembles and the Earth is Afraid... 2015
Homo sapiens 2016
Yellow Fever 2016
The Illinois Parables 2016
Rey 2017
El mar la mar 2017
Godzilla Planet of the Monsters 2017
Streetscapes (4 films) 2017
Godzilla City on the Edge of Battle 2018
Insects 2018
The Night Eats the World 2018
Dead Souls 2018
The Absence of Apricots 2018
Djamilia 2018 (+ the 1960s film)
King Lear 2018
Some recs for 1992:

France
La sentinelle
L 627
Diên Biên Phú

Iran
The Jar

Africa
Hyenas
Udju Azul di Yonta
Allah Tantou

AP
Black Harvest
#JeSuisCharlie Liberté, Liberté chérie !

Image
ImageImageImageImage

User avatar
ChrisReynolds
Donator
Posts: 2148
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: London, UK
Contact:

#28

Post by ChrisReynolds » July 31st, 2018, 10:35 am

maxwelldeux wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 8:30 pm
Each time you watch a film, your average is recalculated based on those 5 watches with 400 checks, plus the check counts for whatever films you've watched for this challenge. Note that shorts and features will be treated equally for this side challenge.
So does this mean that watching a film with ten checks will give an average of (2000+10)/(5+1)=335, but watching 10 six-minute short films each with 100 checks will give an average of (2000+10*100)/(5+10)=200? That could be a bad idea, because it means that the best strategy for this challenge is then to watch lots of very short films, which are inherently less-watched anyway. There's a vast number of tacky one or two minute long YouTube films which no-one has checked that could be mined to win this challenge easily.
I think that when a competitor posts a 60-minute+ block of short films, it should be the average number of checks from that block that are used, and that block counts as one film.

User avatar
shugs
Donator
Posts: 69
Joined: Nov 15, 2014
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

#29

Post by shugs » July 31st, 2018, 11:56 am

I'm in. I'll switch between this challenge and the >1990 one to try and clear some of my movie backlog.

User avatar
zuma
Donator
Posts: 1756
Joined: Jun 14, 2011
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

#30

Post by zuma » July 31st, 2018, 12:12 pm

In

User avatar
te18
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sep 10, 2013
Location: Merry Old England
Contact:

#31

Post by te18 » July 31st, 2018, 1:09 pm

Should tie in well with the 90s-21st Century challenge. In.

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#32

Post by maxwelldeux » July 31st, 2018, 5:19 pm

ChrisReynolds wrote:
July 31st, 2018, 10:35 am
maxwelldeux wrote:
July 28th, 2018, 8:30 pm
Each time you watch a film, your average is recalculated based on those 5 watches with 400 checks, plus the check counts for whatever films you've watched for this challenge. Note that shorts and features will be treated equally for this side challenge.
So does this mean that watching a film with ten checks will give an average of (2000+10)/(5+1)=335, but watching 10 six-minute short films each with 100 checks will give an average of (2000+10*100)/(5+10)=200? That could be a bad idea, because it means that the best strategy for this challenge is then to watch lots of very short films, which are inherently less-watched anyway. There's a vast number of tacky one or two minute long YouTube films which no-one has checked that could be mined to win this challenge easily.
I think that when a competitor posts a 60-minute+ block of short films, it should be the average number of checks from that block that are used, and that block counts as one film.
So pretty much everything you said is correct. Your math is right, and the strategy you outlined would almost certainly win. But a few points in response:

- The goal of the challenge is to encourage people to watch more obscure films. And if shorts are under-seen (and I would agree with you that they are), this challenge would encourage people to watch them. [This is in distinction to TV episodes, which are frequently seen, but under-checked.] So I don't really have a problem if people want to focus their efforts on shorts.
- Remember that this is for the side challenge only, which really counts for nothing beyond bragging rights about obscurity. The main challenge proceeds with (mostly) normal challenge rules. sol's side challenge in the Low-IMDB Challenge was super fun to follow, but ultimately didn't really have much of an impact on the overall challenge, I think.
- Another practical issue is that I just don't have time to set my spreadsheet up the way you suggest. I have a bass-ackwards way of storing challenge data, which works great for updating standings and running out the weekly stats posts, but it's just not practical for what you suggest with the side challenge. And with the amount of things I have going on in both forum and the "outernet", I don't have the time to rethink my set up.

What I'll propose is that we run this as a test - keep the side challenge scoring as-is, but at the end of the month, we can recalculate scores/rankings doing it the way you suggest. That way, next time we do something like this, we'll have better info on what works best. Sound OK?

User avatar
ChrisReynolds
Donator
Posts: 2148
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: London, UK
Contact:

#33

Post by ChrisReynolds » July 31st, 2018, 6:29 pm

maxwelldeux wrote:
July 31st, 2018, 5:19 pm
What I'll propose is that we run this as a test - keep the side challenge scoring as-is, but at the end of the month, we can recalculate scores/rankings doing it the way you suggest. That way, next time we do something like this, we'll have better info on what works best. Sound OK?
That sounds good. Nothing necessarily wrong with running it either way, I just wanted to flag up a possible loophole in the rules. And as you say it's just a side-challenge anyway.

psychotronicbeatnik
Donator
Posts: 958
Joined: Feb 04, 2017
Contact:

#34

Post by psychotronicbeatnik » July 31st, 2018, 7:43 pm

As the rabbit in the overall leader board I'm in, of course. :lol:

Obviously, a film needs to have a listing on ICM to count. Here's one I plan to watch that has an IMDb listing but no ICM listing as of yet so can someone please get it added? It will be great to start off with a film where I will be the first check!

The Alley Cat (2014 / Marie Ullrich)

IMDb listing:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2352434/reference

:cheers:

User avatar
blueboybob
Donator
Posts: 1017
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: DC
Contact:

#35

Post by blueboybob » July 31st, 2018, 7:50 pm

psychotronicbeatnik wrote:
July 31st, 2018, 7:43 pm
As the rabbit in the overall leader board I'm in, of course. :lol:

Obviously, a film needs to have a listing on ICM to count. Here's one I plan to watch that has an IMDb listing but no ICM listing as of yet so can someone please get it added? It will be great to start off with a film where I will be the first check!

The Alley Cat (2014 / Marie Ullrich)

IMDb listing:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2352434/reference

:cheers:
https://www.icheckmovies.com/import/movies/

User avatar
maxwelldeux
Donator
Posts: 3701
Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Location: Seattle-ish, WA, USA
Contact:

#36

Post by maxwelldeux » July 31st, 2018, 8:19 pm

@psycho: https://www.icheckmovies.com/movies/the+alley+cat-2014/

@bbb: Good idea - I'm adding that to the OP.

psychotronicbeatnik
Donator
Posts: 958
Joined: Feb 04, 2017
Contact:

#37

Post by psychotronicbeatnik » July 31st, 2018, 11:56 pm

maxwelldeux wrote:
July 31st, 2018, 8:19 pm
@psycho: https://www.icheckmovies.com/movies/the+alley+cat-2014/

@bbb: Good idea - I'm adding that to the OP.
Thank you Maxwell & Blueboy! :worship:

User avatar
VincentPrice
Posts: 3597
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Maine
Contact:

#38

Post by VincentPrice » August 1st, 2018, 5:04 am

1. Wagon Train-1940: 7/10 (11 checks)
2. Jewel Robbery-1932: 8/10 (151 checks)

User avatar
Mate_cosido
Posts: 518
Joined: Apr 28, 2016
Contact:

#39

Post by Mate_cosido » August 1st, 2018, 7:02 am

1. Kkum-bo-da hae-mong - A Matter of Interpretation (2014, Kwang-kuk Lee) 10 checks *rewatch

User avatar
te18
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sep 10, 2013
Location: Merry Old England
Contact:

#40

Post by te18 » August 1st, 2018, 9:14 am

Image
1. Mrs. Ashboro's Cat aka. Ghost Cat [2003] 3/10 22 checks
Terminally lame TV movie about the ghost of an old lady's cat saving the protagonists from the conniving schemes of a cash-strapped nephew and corrupt real estate investor. Only notable for being a pre-breakout role for Ellen Page, although frankly she's almost as bad in this as the rest of the cast.
SpoilerShow
1. Mrs. Ashboro's Cat aka. Ghost Cat [2003] 3/10 22 checks
Last edited by te18 on August 1st, 2018, 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply