I would imagine there are enough anarchists and right wingers here that you would get a lot of automatic "yes"s. I.e. anarchists wanting to avoid any coercion unless strictly necessary and right wingers "free speeching". If you go to the extremes you end up finding out that it's a political doughnut rather than a left right spectrum
Some might perceive this as targeting PdA, whereas it would be better to have some rules that apply for everyone, i.e. only lists constructed in 2019 accepted, maximum number of titles 500, lists not accepted if they contain multiple entries with more than 400 checks.
A lot of input should come from whoever is collating the results, if they're happy to do all PdA's <400 filtering for him, and double the number of titles they have to tally then there's less of a case.
As some context PdA has had a very prankish past, often his voting would be designed to reflect flaws in the structure of the polls. In some year polls he just used to do enter 1 title, i.e. didn't want to give any of the competing titles any points. So many polls now say minimum of 10 entries. I think the best outcome would just be that we had some firmer rules in place about how we accept ballots.
Would be nice to hear from PdA himself but he usually steers clear of these discussions.