Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
NOTE: Board emails should be working again. Information on forum upgrade and style issues.
Podcast: Talking Images (Episode 22 released November 17th * EXCLUSIVE * We Are Mentioned in a Book!!! Interview with Mary Guillermin on Rapture, JG & More)
Polls: Directors (Waiting for results), 1929 (Results), Directorial Debut Features (Mar 12th), DtC - Nominations (Mar 20th)
Challenges: Experimental/Avant Garde, Benelux, Run the Director
Film of the Week: Daisan no kagemusha, April nominations (Apr 1st)

The quest to rescue the IMDb lists

MMDan
Posts: 211
Joined: January 10th, 2016, 7:00 am
Contact:

#721

Post by MMDan »

PeacefulAnarchy on Sep 22 2016, 12:48:00 PM wrote:Nope :( I've been updating the imdb source filters, so if you click the source link on the lists you can see the updated version on imdb, at least.
Thanks for keeping up the work of updating though PA! :D
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13430
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#722

Post by Cippenham »

So someone could create temporary lists as these are not updated anymore and no guarantee they will be. A possible solution but not ideal. But yes they would be unofficial.
Turning over a new leaf :ICM:
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#723

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

They will be updated eventually, yes. It's not intentional that they aren't updated, it's due to imdb changing the display code and Marijn needing to adjust how the site scrapes the search results.
MMDan
Posts: 211
Joined: January 10th, 2016, 7:00 am
Contact:

#724

Post by MMDan »

It looks like top 250 was updated. oh joy...
Nathan Treadway
Donator
Posts: 4411
Joined: June 26th, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Contact:

#725

Post by Nathan Treadway »

MMDan on Sep 29 2016, 01:49:06 PM wrote:It looks like top 250 was updated. oh joy...
One Indian film in position 250 that's already off the source list. Hardly a distraction. It'll probably be one that pops in and out, so, I'll give it a go, for what it's worth. (I'm trying to maintain a platinum in that list.)
iCM

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ (Matthew 25:37-40)
User avatar
brokenface
Donator
Posts: 13808
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:00 am
Contact:

#726

Post by brokenface »

Kahaani is not bad, it's very much Hollywood rather than Bollywood style. Not worthy of top 250 but not a chore to watch
User avatar
xianjiro
Donator
Posts: 8927
Joined: June 17th, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Kakistani Left Coast
Contact:

#727

Post by xianjiro »

just put it on hold - it will probably disappear from the Top 250 before I get to watch it but at least I'll have another check on Top Rated Indian Movies - still got a ways to go for tin, let alone bronze - so when are we making this one official? :o :P
User avatar
Fergenaprido
Donator
Posts: 5091
Joined: June 3rd, 2014, 6:00 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

#728

Post by Fergenaprido »

Kahaani's been popping in and out of the bottom of the list for the last year or so: http://250.took.nl/title/1821480
It'll probably continue to do so for a while longer.
🧚‍♂️🦫
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13430
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#729

Post by Cippenham »

treadwaynathan on Sep 30 2016, 01:17:29 AM wrote:
MMDan on Sep 29 2016, 01:49:06 PM wrote:It looks like top 250 was updated. oh joy...
One Indian film in position 250 that's already off the source list. Hardly a distraction. It'll probably be one that pops in and out, so, I'll give it a go, for what it's worth. (I'm trying to maintain a platinum in that list.)
No, give up like I did a while ago.. :D
Turning over a new leaf :ICM:
User avatar
AdamH
Site Admin
Posts: 12917
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#730

Post by AdamH »

I've started to my unchecked films that are in the most official list on iCM. I wish the IMDb lists were removed as it totally distorts the number of lists. A film can be in a few made-up genre lists. It would be good if you could filter out lists when you're on the most unchecked page or, better, if the lists were deleted entirely other than the Top 250.
User avatar
Gorro
Donator
Posts: 661
Joined: August 28th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#731

Post by Gorro »

AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 12:11:11 PM wrote:I've started to my unchecked films that are in the most official list on iCM. I wish the IMDb lists were removed as it totally distorts the number of lists. A film can be in a few made-up genre lists. It would be good if you could filter out lists when you're on the most unchecked page or, better, if the lists were deleted entirely other than the Top 250.
Deleting would be a terrible decision. These list are more popular than many of the other lists on the site.
User avatar
AdamH
Site Admin
Posts: 12917
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#732

Post by AdamH »

Gorro on Feb 28 2017, 03:43:58 PM wrote:
AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 12:11:11 PM wrote:I've started to my unchecked films that are in the most official list on iCM. I wish the IMDb lists were removed as it totally distorts the number of lists. A film can be in a few made-up genre lists. It would be good if you could filter out lists when you're on the most unchecked page or, better, if the lists were deleted entirely other than the Top 250.
Deleting would be a terrible decision. These list are more popular than many of the other lists on the site.
Maybe but the lists don't even exist anymore. They are just manual search results of decades/genres. They aren't official lists at all.
User avatar
max-scl
Posts: 842
Joined: June 20th, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

#733

Post by max-scl »

Yes, they suck. The "follow the source" rule strangely does not apply for these lists.
User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13073
Joined: May 26th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#734

Post by bal3x »

max-scl on Feb 28 2017, 04:40:44 PM wrote:Yes, they suck. The "follow the source" rule strangely does not apply for these lists.
Indeed, I don't even understand why this is up for debate - some people are forgetting that there is no source... so these lists should have been removed long time ago when IMDb removed theirs.
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#735

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

There is a source, the source is imdb ratings. The source is just more flawed than before because we don't get imdb's weighting of the rating.

The lists are fine as far as reflecting imdb ratings of movies. Whether you find value in imdb highest rated lists is another matter, of course.
User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13073
Joined: May 26th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#736

Post by bal3x »

PeacefulAnarchy on Feb 28 2017, 05:53:00 PM wrote:There is a source, the source is imdb ratings. The source is just more flawed than before because we don't get imdb's weighting of the rating.

The lists are fine as far as reflecting imdb ratings of movies. Whether you find value in imdb highest rated lists is another matter, of course.
Well, they did remove the lists, right? The idea with the ratings thing came later so this is clearly not the same "source" that was used earlier. Anyways, I really don't care about those lists, I just believe that if iCM wants to follow the source they should not be there, but this can be an endless debate. If people like them, fine - let them stay there.
User avatar
monty
Posts: 12791
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#737

Post by monty »

bal3x on Feb 28 2017, 05:31:29 PM wrote:
max-scl on Feb 28 2017, 04:40:44 PM wrote:Yes, they suck. The "follow the source" rule strangely does not apply for these lists.
Indeed, I don't even understand why this is up for debate - some people are forgetting that there is no source... so these lists should have been removed long time ago when IMDb removed theirs.
Indeed.
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#738

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

They aren't the same lists as before, but the source itself (imdb ratings) is still there.

There is an argument for removing them, but "follow the source" isn't really it. I think they are fine and clearly popular and I don't think Marijn wants to remove them, but I do understand people thinking they're clutter that isn't useful.
User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13073
Joined: May 26th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#739

Post by bal3x »

PeacefulAnarchy on Feb 28 2017, 06:15:15 PM wrote:They aren't the same lists as before, but the source itself (imdb ratings) is still there.

There is an argument for removing them, but "follow the source" isn't really it. I think they are fine and clearly popular and I don't think Marijn wants to remove them, but I do understand people thinking they're clutter that isn't useful.
Fair enough, but this is Marijn's call, if he decided to keep them, I have no problem continuing to ignore them :)
User avatar
AdamH
Site Admin
Posts: 12917
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#740

Post by AdamH »

If the IMDb lists had never existed on IMDb.com then would people be in favour of adding manual search results as official lists? Genuinely interested.
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#741

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

They're not bad lists, really. Even the 1910s is less terrible than it used to be. There's some Bollywood on some of the lists, but it matches the Bollywood that is now in the Top 250 so whatever. I'd honestly rather finish the decade and genre (except sports) lists than the Top 250 at this point.
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#742

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 06:23:32 PM wrote:If the IMDb lists had never existed on IMDb.com then would people be in favour of adding manual search results as official lists? Genuinely interested.
Probably, given that people have at various times proposed making such lists from mubi or RYM ratings. Maybe not mini-series or independent which I don't think would be something many people would consider if they hadn't already been on imdb, but the main genre and decades, yeah there'd be support for those.
User avatar
Onderhond
Posts: 6110
Joined: December 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#743

Post by Onderhond »

Interestingly enough I thought this thread was going to be about saner genre indications, not about people's aversion to Bollywood cinema.
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#744

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

Did you reread the thread from the beginning? Cause at this point the thread is just about hating imdb ratings based lists vs being ok with all these popular movies having a ton of lists to their name.

Also saner genre definitions is never going to happen because that part is up to imdb. But there has definitely been discussion about that around these parts. Probably even in this thread.
Last edited by PeacefulAnarchy on March 1st, 2017, 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Onderhond
Posts: 6110
Joined: December 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#745

Post by Onderhond »

PeacefulAnarchy on Feb 28 2017, 06:49:54 PM wrote:Also saner genre definitions is never going to happen because that part is up to imdb. But there has definitely been discussion about that around these parts. Probably even in this thread.
Yeah, I figured as much.

Might read through some of the older pages, it's interesting to see how far people are willing to go to maul lists to accommodate their own taste :)
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#746

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

Even though dislike for Bollywood, Turkish comedies and maybe Russian comedies (And their inflated imdb ratings) is definitely an undercurrent in the whole discussion and process of this thread, it should be noted that the primary concern wasn't Like Stars on Earth or Ivan Vasilievich so much as fake vote spam like this: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6290024/ or http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5813916/ which may or may not be good movies, but are not actually films with fair ratings and do not match any kind of legitimate populism of imdb votes.

The lists have been going the way they are now for over 2 and a half years, though, and the solution we settled upon has been pretty robust and has minimal bias for taste.
User avatar
Chilton
Posts: 575
Joined: January 5th, 2013, 7:00 am
Contact:

#747

Post by Chilton »

Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 25938
Joined: May 8th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#748

Post by PeacefulAnarchy »

Chilton on Mar 1 2017, 01:29:12 AM wrote:Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
Coding time plus the fact that favourites aren't used enough by the userbase to make viable lists for the lower popularity genres and decades. It is, I think, a backburner consideration so may happen sometime, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
User avatar
monclivie
Posts: 368
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Poland
Contact:

#749

Post by monclivie »

AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 12:11:11 PM wrote:I've started to my unchecked films that are in the most official list on iCM. I wish the IMDb lists were removed as it totally distorts the number of lists. A film can be in a few made-up genre lists. It would be good if you could filter out lists when you're on the most unchecked page or, better, if the lists were deleted entirely other than the Top 250.
Can't you just add all the other lists to your list watchlist and do the cross-reference search?
User avatar
joachimt
Donator
Posts: 33376
Joined: February 16th, 2012, 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

#750

Post by joachimt »

AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 06:23:32 PM wrote:If the IMDb lists had never existed on IMDb.com then would people be in favour of adding manual search results as official lists? Genuinely interested.
Funny question actually.
If the IMDb-lists had never existed, iCM would never have existed. The site started, because Erik wanted an easy way of keeping track of his process on the IMDb-lists.
ICM-profile
Fergenaprido: "I find your OCD to be adorable, J"
User avatar
AdamH
Site Admin
Posts: 12917
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#751

Post by AdamH »

monclivie on Mar 1 2017, 02:14:21 AM wrote:
AdamH on Feb 28 2017, 12:11:11 PM wrote:I've started to my unchecked films that are in the most official list on iCM. I wish the IMDb lists were removed as it totally distorts the number of lists. A film can be in a few made-up genre lists. It would be good if you could filter out lists when you're on the most unchecked page or, better, if the lists were deleted entirely other than the Top 250.
Can't you just add all the other lists to your list watchlist and do the cross-reference search?
Thanks for the tip. I'm trying to do that now but I can't get it to work. I'm adding almost all of the lists other than IMDb to my watchlist. How do I then see a list of unchecked films sorted by number of lists (in my watchlist)? I just installed the Enhanced script.
User avatar
AdamH
Site Admin
Posts: 12917
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#752

Post by AdamH »

Got it working now. Is there any way to select the lists to be cross-referenced without manually selecting them all from the watchlist i.e. selecting them all at once? Just that I'm selecting 100+ lists when I do it. Great script btw. Thanks themagician.
Last edited by AdamH on March 1st, 2017, 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WalterNeff
Donator
Posts: 3320
Joined: July 27th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#753

Post by WalterNeff »

Chilton on Mar 1 2017, 01:29:12 AM wrote:Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
I once suggested taking all of the big (1000+) lists, and creating iCM decades lists from them to replace the IMDb lists, and then getting rid of the genre lists.
User avatar
ChrisReynolds
Donator
Posts: 2642
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:00 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

#754

Post by ChrisReynolds »

PeacefulAnarchy on Mar 1 2017, 02:00:22 AM wrote:
Chilton on Mar 1 2017, 01:29:12 AM wrote:Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
Coding time plus the fact that favourites aren't used enough by the userbase to make viable lists for the lower popularity genres and decades. It is, I think, a backburner consideration so may happen sometime, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
The manual IMDb searches combined with the iCM check limit always seemed like a temporary measure, but getting iCM 3.0 working should be a higher priority.
User avatar
Lammetje
Donator
Posts: 4086
Joined: October 4th, 2013, 6:00 am
Location: Poland
Contact:

#755

Post by Lammetje »

WalterNeff on Mar 1 2017, 09:24:38 AM wrote:
Chilton on Mar 1 2017, 01:29:12 AM wrote:Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
I once suggested taking all of the big (1000+) lists, and creating iCM decades lists from them to replace the IMDb lists, and then getting rid of the genre lists.
Film-noir is also a genre list... :whistling:
iCM | IMDb | Last.fm | Listal

Image
OldAle1 wrote:I think four Aamir Khan films is enough for me. Unless I'm down to one film left on the IMDb Top 250 at some point and he's in that last film, at which point I'll watch it and then shoot myself having become the official-check-whoring person I hate.
More memorable quotes
PeacefulAnarchy wrote:Active topics is the devil. Please use the forums and subforums as intended and peruse all the topics nicely sorted by topic, not just the currently popular ones displayed in a jumbled mess.
maxwelldeux wrote:If you asked me to kill my wife and pets OR watch Minions, I'd check the runtime and inquire about sobriety requirements before providing an answer.
Torgo wrote:Lammetje is some kind of hybrid Anna-Kendrick-lamb-entity to me and I find that very cool.
monty wrote:If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. iCM ain't for sissies.
mightysparks wrote:ARGH. RARGH. RARGH. DIE.
Kowry wrote:Thanks, Art Garfunky.
Rich wrote:*runs*
User avatar
max-scl
Posts: 842
Joined: June 20th, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

#756

Post by max-scl »

What about the 100 Essential Westerns list which is based on a IMDb forum poll? Why not replace with a book list or something better?
User avatar
WalterNeff
Donator
Posts: 3320
Joined: July 27th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#757

Post by WalterNeff »

Lammetje on Mar 2 2017, 02:04:12 PM wrote:
WalterNeff on Mar 1 2017, 09:24:38 AM wrote:
Chilton on Mar 1 2017, 01:29:12 AM wrote:Why not replace those IMDB-lists with similar ICM-lists?
I once suggested taking all of the big (1000+) lists, and creating iCM decades lists from them to replace the IMDb lists, and then getting rid of the genre lists.
Film-noir is also a genre list... :whistling:
See the sacrifices I am willing to make?
User avatar
joachimt
Donator
Posts: 33376
Joined: February 16th, 2012, 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

#758

Post by joachimt »

max-scl on Mar 2 2017, 03:15:24 PM wrote:What about the 100 Essential Westerns list which is based on a IMDb forum poll? Why not replace with a book list or something better?
I agree with this. We did the same with the old horror list. Any suggestions for a good replacement?
ICM-profile
Fergenaprido: "I find your OCD to be adorable, J"
User avatar
Gorro
Donator
Posts: 661
Joined: August 28th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#759

Post by Gorro »

BFI Screen Guide is a good alternative. https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/100+ ... kasparius/

Those are already official for several other genres (Scifi, Musical, Docu, Animation)
Last edited by Gorro on March 2nd, 2017, 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dirty_score
Posts: 414
Joined: October 10th, 2016, 6:00 am
Contact:

#760

Post by dirty_score »

Paste's 100 Best Western Movies

and if you please get rid of the spaghetti list as well. :shoot:

Also, i believe Kasparius would be honored: How The West Was Shot :cowboy:
Post Reply