Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
Polls: Shorts (Results), 2007 (Nov 22nd), 1932 awards (Nov 24th), Knockout competition (Round 3)
Challenges: Noir, Unofficial, Korean, 2020 schedule
Film of the Week: Saenghwalui balgyeon, December nominations (Nov 29th)
World Cup S4: Round 1 preparation (Nov 28th)
Film Festival: Main Slate, International, English-Language Independents, Documentaries, Arthouse, Animation, LGBT, Just Before Dawn (Dec 2nd)

US Politics thread

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

Re: US Politics thread

#15721

Post by Cippenham » November 5th, 2019, 12:55 pm

Not bullying but making comments people can identify with. Dems cannot do that.

User avatar
Kublai Khan
Posts: 850
Joined: Nov 09, 2014
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#15722

Post by Kublai Khan » November 5th, 2019, 9:29 pm

Cippenham wrote:
November 5th, 2019, 12:55 pm
Not bullying but making comments people can identify with. Dems cannot do that.
Trump gains in popularity when he makes snide, nasty comments or comes up with childish nicknames for people. Plainly call it what it is.

User avatar
sebby
Posts: 5981
Joined: Jul 04, 2011
Contact:

#15723

Post by sebby » November 5th, 2019, 10:57 pm

Cippenham wrote:
November 5th, 2019, 12:55 pm
Not bullying but making comments people can identify with. Dems cannot do that.
Your transformation into a MAGAhead after slagging Trump initially these last few years has been hilarious to watch. The man is arguably the most famous real-life bully in the history of the world. That's not an exaggeration. And you somehow are trying to deny that and re-appropriate his bullying as something positive. Conservative nutbaggery in a nutshell here. No backbone, no morality, no logic. Business as usual.

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15724

Post by matthewscott8 » November 6th, 2019, 1:05 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 2nd, 2019, 5:27 am
I take it you have a different opinion x. 😁. I thought I would read up on this and opinion is divided, some say it’s more climate, some poor forest management and done a mixture of both, there is no need to react in such a rude and appalling way. We can disagree and be polite. As far I can see opinions are mixed and there is case for saying it is poor management, even the California government agrees according to the information below.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/14/ ... e-debacle/

But as it upsets you, not posting more about this.
Cipp, I'm gonna have to break something to you, climate change is happening. This actually isn't a contentious point. I mean there are temperature measurement stations all over the earth and there have been for a long time. And the temperature is going up. If you want to do your contrarian, I know more than the experts / learned fools, far right shtick this is how the shtick actually goes. What those folks say is that humans are not causing climate change, it's caused by a variation in solar activity, and so we don't have to worry about burning fossil fuels, burn away we can't actually effect the climate. Now that isn't backed by the community of people who do the research, although sure, you can, and you have in the past identified the cranks and kooks, and start with the conclusion people on the fringe of the scientific community or scientific specialists in non-climate areas who say that man made / anthropogenic climate change is not happening; in fact I would say you are an expert in finding these people, your dedication in the area is astonishing, but you also somehow completely ignore the huge mass of scientists, 100 times larger and more qualified, who are saying the opposite. I mean the weight of numbers on the antro side is astonishing, when you think of how much money the oil industry is throwing at fake science designed to prove the oppoiste conclusion.

But what you are now peddling I think is you going off the script your masters have handed to you. Because no-one is denying the earth is warming, that is measured, that is empirical, but you can deny the science, because that is all hypothesis based and the hypothesis is difficult to test. That is where your room-for-doubt contrarian buddies are camped out, the doubt about what is causing it; you can look at your hand and not doubt that you have 4 fingers and a thumb, but you can doubt me as a scientist when I tell you about the Hox genes and my theory of limb morphogenesis. However we can actually test that quite easily, and I could convince you in the end. I could show you what happens in less complicated creatures when we disrupt the hox genes. Unfortunately the planet is of such a scale that I can't conduct experiments on a planet B for you to convince you about antropogenic climate change. However there is no reasonable position where you can deny, firstly that you have 5 digits on your hand and secondly that the earth is heating up. In fact denier in chief Donald Trump is positively banking on this continuning, which is why he is making the play for Greenland.

The question that seems important is, why do you want to be in that camp. I will give you the two reasons people are usually in that camp, have a hard think and tell me if either apply to you (1) The world is a bewildering place that is constantly changing, social norms are changing, the wealth of human knowledge is expanding exponentially, it's not possible to grasp the breadth of human knowledge, and hasn't been for at least a couple of centuries. This is disorienting , anxietising, and frankly emasculating, by far the easiest solution is to pretend that all social change is the product of the devil, and all the new knowledge is nerdishness/foolishness. (2) Climate change knowledge is a pain in the rectum, what it says is there is now a lot of restrictions on your behaviour, if you fly away on holiday you are actually a bad person, or if you go for a drive in the countryside, merely for the sake of enjoyment, you are a bad person. A generation of people grew up with these freedoms and enjoyed them innocently. Now the veil of ignorance is removed, and actually you have to feel guilty all the time, and it's not fair because your parents' generation didn't have to. Solution (a) accept the new knowledge and restrict your enjoyment of life (b) pretend it's all lies. Guess which one of the two options is by far the easier... Oh and by the way the Americans you have spoken to on your travels, those ones in the countryside particularly, the guiltless travel thing is a huge thing in their psyche, it's an integral part of the American dream.

The actual californian wildfires piece confuses the issue a bit, because there are forestry management issues, and also forest fires are natural in that part of the world. However climate change certainly will increase the frequecy of them.

User avatar
Kublai Khan
Posts: 850
Joined: Nov 09, 2014
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#15725

Post by Kublai Khan » November 6th, 2019, 4:02 am

Looks like Kentucky elected a Democrat Governor. :satstunned: :thumbsup: :cheers: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

User avatar
Cocoa
Donator
Posts: 1578
Joined: Jul 17, 2013
Location: Chicago, USA
Contact:

#15726

Post by Cocoa » November 6th, 2019, 4:39 am

Virginia's House of Delegates and state Senate both flipped blue. THEY SHOULD NOW HAVE THE NUMBERS TO RATIFY THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT!

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15727

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am

matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 1:05 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 2nd, 2019, 5:27 am
I take it you have a different opinion x. 😁. I thought I would read up on this and opinion is divided, some say it’s more climate, some poor forest management and done a mixture of both, there is no need to react in such a rude and appalling way. We can disagree and be polite. As far I can see opinions are mixed and there is case for saying it is poor management, even the California government agrees according to the information below.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/14/ ... e-debacle/

But as it upsets you, not posting more about this.
Cipp, I'm gonna have to break something to you, climate change is happening. This actually isn't a contentious point. I mean there are temperature measurement stations all over the earth and there have been for a long time. And the temperature is going up. If you want to do your contrarian, I know more than the experts / learned fools, far right shtick this is how the shtick actually goes. What those folks say is that humans are not causing climate change, it's caused by a variation in solar activity, and so we don't have to worry about burning fossil fuels, burn away we can't actually effect the climate. Now that isn't backed by the community of people who do the research, although sure, you can, and you have in the past identified the cranks and kooks, and start with the conclusion people on the fringe of the scientific community or scientific specialists in non-climate areas who say that man made / anthropogenic climate change is not happening; in fact I would say you are an expert in finding these people, your dedication in the area is astonishing, but you also somehow completely ignore the huge mass of scientists, 100 times larger and more qualified, who are saying the opposite. I mean the weight of numbers on the antro side is astonishing, when you think of how much money the oil industry is throwing at fake science designed to prove the oppoiste conclusion.

But what you are now peddling I think is you going off the script your masters have handed to you. Because no-one is denying the earth is warming, that is measured, that is empirical, but you can deny the science, because that is all hypothesis based and the hypothesis is difficult to test. That is where your room-for-doubt contrarian buddies are camped out, the doubt about what is causing it; you can look at your hand and not doubt that you have 4 fingers and a thumb, but you can doubt me as a scientist when I tell you about the Hox genes and my theory of limb morphogenesis. However we can actually test that quite easily, and I could convince you in the end. I could show you what happens in less complicated creatures when we disrupt the hox genes. Unfortunately the planet is of such a scale that I can't conduct experiments on a planet B for you to convince you about antropogenic climate change. However there is no reasonable position where you can deny, firstly that you have 5 digits on your hand and secondly that the earth is heating up. In fact denier in chief Donald Trump is positively banking on this continuning, which is why he is making the play for Greenland.

The question that seems important is, why do you want to be in that camp. I will give you the two reasons people are usually in that camp, have a hard think and tell me if either apply to you (1) The world is a bewildering place that is constantly changing, social norms are changing, the wealth of human knowledge is expanding exponentially, it's not possible to grasp the breadth of human knowledge, and hasn't been for at least a couple of centuries. This is disorienting , anxietising, and frankly emasculating, by far the easiest solution is to pretend that all social change is the product of the devil, and all the new knowledge is nerdishness/foolishness. (2) Climate change knowledge is a pain in the rectum, what it says is there is now a lot of restrictions on your behaviour, if you fly away on holiday you are actually a bad person, or if you go for a drive in the countryside, merely for the sake of enjoyment, you are a bad person. A generation of people grew up with these freedoms and enjoyed them innocently. Now the veil of ignorance is removed, and actually you have to feel guilty all the time, and it's not fair because your parents' generation didn't have to. Solution (a) accept the new knowledge and restrict your enjoyment of life (b) pretend it's all lies. Guess which one of the two options is by far the easier... Oh and by the way the Americans you have spoken to on your travels, those ones in the countryside particularly, the guiltless travel thing is a huge thing in their psyche, it's an integral part of the American dream.

The actual californian wildfires piece confuses the issue a bit, because there are forestry management issues, and also forest fires are natural in that part of the world. However climate change certainly will increase the frequecy of them.
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15728

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 5:27 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 1:05 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 2nd, 2019, 5:27 am
I take it you have a different opinion x. 😁. I thought I would read up on this and opinion is divided, some say it’s more climate, some poor forest management and done a mixture of both, there is no need to react in such a rude and appalling way. We can disagree and be polite. As far I can see opinions are mixed and there is case for saying it is poor management, even the California government agrees according to the information below.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/14/ ... e-debacle/

But as it upsets you, not posting more about this.
Cipp, I'm gonna have to break something to you, climate change is happening. This actually isn't a contentious point. I mean there are temperature measurement stations all over the earth and there have been for a long time. And the temperature is going up. If you want to do your contrarian, I know more than the experts / learned fools, far right shtick this is how the shtick actually goes. What those folks say is that humans are not causing climate change, it's caused by a variation in solar activity, and so we don't have to worry about burning fossil fuels, burn away we can't actually effect the climate. Now that isn't backed by the community of people who do the research, although sure, you can, and you have in the past identified the cranks and kooks, and start with the conclusion people on the fringe of the scientific community or scientific specialists in non-climate areas who say that man made / anthropogenic climate change is not happening; in fact I would say you are an expert in finding these people, your dedication in the area is astonishing, but you also somehow completely ignore the huge mass of scientists, 100 times larger and more qualified, who are saying the opposite. I mean the weight of numbers on the antro side is astonishing, when you think of how much money the oil industry is throwing at fake science designed to prove the oppoiste conclusion.

But what you are now peddling I think is you going off the script your masters have handed to you. Because no-one is denying the earth is warming, that is measured, that is empirical, but you can deny the science, because that is all hypothesis based and the hypothesis is difficult to test. That is where your room-for-doubt contrarian buddies are camped out, the doubt about what is causing it; you can look at your hand and not doubt that you have 4 fingers and a thumb, but you can doubt me as a scientist when I tell you about the Hox genes and my theory of limb morphogenesis. However we can actually test that quite easily, and I could convince you in the end. I could show you what happens in less complicated creatures when we disrupt the hox genes. Unfortunately the planet is of such a scale that I can't conduct experiments on a planet B for you to convince you about antropogenic climate change. However there is no reasonable position where you can deny, firstly that you have 5 digits on your hand and secondly that the earth is heating up. In fact denier in chief Donald Trump is positively banking on this continuning, which is why he is making the play for Greenland.

The question that seems important is, why do you want to be in that camp. I will give you the two reasons people are usually in that camp, have a hard think and tell me if either apply to you (1) The world is a bewildering place that is constantly changing, social norms are changing, the wealth of human knowledge is expanding exponentially, it's not possible to grasp the breadth of human knowledge, and hasn't been for at least a couple of centuries. This is disorienting , anxietising, and frankly emasculating, by far the easiest solution is to pretend that all social change is the product of the devil, and all the new knowledge is nerdishness/foolishness. (2) Climate change knowledge is a pain in the rectum, what it says is there is now a lot of restrictions on your behaviour, if you fly away on holiday you are actually a bad person, or if you go for a drive in the countryside, merely for the sake of enjoyment, you are a bad person. A generation of people grew up with these freedoms and enjoyed them innocently. Now the veil of ignorance is removed, and actually you have to feel guilty all the time, and it's not fair because your parents' generation didn't have to. Solution (a) accept the new knowledge and restrict your enjoyment of life (b) pretend it's all lies. Guess which one of the two options is by far the easier... Oh and by the way the Americans you have spoken to on your travels, those ones in the countryside particularly, the guiltless travel thing is a huge thing in their psyche, it's an integral part of the American dream.

The actual californian wildfires piece confuses the issue a bit, because there are forestry management issues, and also forest fires are natural in that part of the world. However climate change certainly will increase the frequecy of them.
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere, not saying there was not warming but it’s not caused by CO2 but the sun. NASA chart now however shows cooling.

http://geoclastica.com/ClimateSeaLevelChange.htm

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15729

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 5:51 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:27 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 1:05 am
Cipp, I'm gonna have to break something to you, climate change is happening. This actually isn't a contentious point. I mean there are temperature measurement stations all over the earth and there have been for a long time. And the temperature is going up. If you want to do your contrarian, I know more than the experts / learned fools, far right shtick this is how the shtick actually goes. What those folks say is that humans are not causing climate change, it's caused by a variation in solar activity, and so we don't have to worry about burning fossil fuels, burn away we can't actually effect the climate. Now that isn't backed by the community of people who do the research, although sure, you can, and you have in the past identified the cranks and kooks, and start with the conclusion people on the fringe of the scientific community or scientific specialists in non-climate areas who say that man made / anthropogenic climate change is not happening; in fact I would say you are an expert in finding these people, your dedication in the area is astonishing, but you also somehow completely ignore the huge mass of scientists, 100 times larger and more qualified, who are saying the opposite. I mean the weight of numbers on the antro side is astonishing, when you think of how much money the oil industry is throwing at fake science designed to prove the oppoiste conclusion.

But what you are now peddling I think is you going off the script your masters have handed to you. Because no-one is denying the earth is warming, that is measured, that is empirical, but you can deny the science, because that is all hypothesis based and the hypothesis is difficult to test. That is where your room-for-doubt contrarian buddies are camped out, the doubt about what is causing it; you can look at your hand and not doubt that you have 4 fingers and a thumb, but you can doubt me as a scientist when I tell you about the Hox genes and my theory of limb morphogenesis. However we can actually test that quite easily, and I could convince you in the end. I could show you what happens in less complicated creatures when we disrupt the hox genes. Unfortunately the planet is of such a scale that I can't conduct experiments on a planet B for you to convince you about antropogenic climate change. However there is no reasonable position where you can deny, firstly that you have 5 digits on your hand and secondly that the earth is heating up. In fact denier in chief Donald Trump is positively banking on this continuning, which is why he is making the play for Greenland.

The question that seems important is, why do you want to be in that camp. I will give you the two reasons people are usually in that camp, have a hard think and tell me if either apply to you (1) The world is a bewildering place that is constantly changing, social norms are changing, the wealth of human knowledge is expanding exponentially, it's not possible to grasp the breadth of human knowledge, and hasn't been for at least a couple of centuries. This is disorienting , anxietising, and frankly emasculating, by far the easiest solution is to pretend that all social change is the product of the devil, and all the new knowledge is nerdishness/foolishness. (2) Climate change knowledge is a pain in the rectum, what it says is there is now a lot of restrictions on your behaviour, if you fly away on holiday you are actually a bad person, or if you go for a drive in the countryside, merely for the sake of enjoyment, you are a bad person. A generation of people grew up with these freedoms and enjoyed them innocently. Now the veil of ignorance is removed, and actually you have to feel guilty all the time, and it's not fair because your parents' generation didn't have to. Solution (a) accept the new knowledge and restrict your enjoyment of life (b) pretend it's all lies. Guess which one of the two options is by far the easier... Oh and by the way the Americans you have spoken to on your travels, those ones in the countryside particularly, the guiltless travel thing is a huge thing in their psyche, it's an integral part of the American dream.

The actual californian wildfires piece confuses the issue a bit, because there are forestry management issues, and also forest fires are natural in that part of the world. However climate change certainly will increase the frequecy of them.
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere, not saying there was not warming but it’s not caused by CO2 but the sun. NASA chart now however shows cooling.

http://geoclastica.com/ClimateSeaLevelChange.htm


https://www.researchgate.net/project/Im ... level-rise

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15730

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 5:52 am

But I see no point in debating the climate.

User avatar
St. Gloede
Moderator
Posts: 10123
Joined: May 06, 2011
Contact:

#15731

Post by St. Gloede » November 6th, 2019, 7:15 am

If you see no point in debating it, why consistently bring it up?

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15732

Post by matthewscott8 » November 6th, 2019, 7:32 am

Even the charlatan you managed to dig up there said global warming has been happening, just that it ended in February 2019.

What he didn't tell you is that July 2019 was the hottest month for the planet that has EVER BEEN RECORDED.

You cannot argue with stuff like that it is just measurement. https://www.noaa.gov/news/july-2019-was ... for-planet

We're on course for either the 2nd or 3rd hottest year ever recorded.

Honestly man, just face up to your fears.

User avatar
sebby
Posts: 5981
Joined: Jul 04, 2011
Contact:

#15733

Post by sebby » November 6th, 2019, 8:05 am

Cipp is falling in line with the team he joined up with. Whatever they believe, he believes. If they flip on climate change or anything else you can bet he will as well.

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15734

Post by matthewscott8 » November 6th, 2019, 9:33 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere
I admit you attempted to engage with the science. In a very painful amateur way. And you also posted me links to websites run by oil company stooges and individuals on the fringe of science with degree level education similar to mine. But you still haven't acknowledged that there is an overwhelming consensus amongst the meteorological community that anthropogenic climate change is happening. You will never acknowledge this because it would mean that you have to change your lifestyle and you are too selfish.

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15735

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 6th, 2019, 12:38 pm

Now this is how you make an election platform.

https://www.joshua2020.com/platform

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15736

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 6th, 2019, 3:41 pm

He wants to abolish homework and it is shown in a few schools that it has positive effects, while kamala harris wants the school-life balance of kids ruined https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... ange-that/

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15737

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 6th, 2019, 3:58 pm

She did this with the student loans too. She takes important left topics, like abolishing student loans and the importance of education, and comes up with the worst idea possible for it.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15738

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 6:57 pm

Who do you think will get the nomination. I think Biden will have to drop out. Don’t forget the powers that be will do everything to stop a left wing candidate.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15739

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 7:01 pm

matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 9:33 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere
I admit you attempted to engage with the science. In a very painful amateur way. And you also posted me links to websites run by oil company stooges and individuals on the fringe of science with degree level education similar to mine. But you still haven't acknowledged that there is an overwhelming consensus amongst the meteorological community that anthropogenic climate change is happening. You will never acknowledge this because it would mean that you have to change your lifestyle and you are too selfish.
They believe in it as they are paid, or as sheep, or without actual evidence. Eventually the truth will be clear. But in the meantime we wasted billions on all this. In future cars and energy could have or use something like a hydrogen or unlimited source anyway , not just electric cars.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15740

Post by Cippenham » November 6th, 2019, 7:02 pm


Straka
Posts: 333
Joined: Jun 20, 2011
Contact:

#15741

Post by Straka » November 6th, 2019, 8:01 pm

Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 7:01 pm
In future cars and energy could have or use something like a hydrogen or unlimited source anyway , not just electric cars.
Hydrogen cars ARE just electric cars. You will always need energy to produce the hydrogen, it is not readily available in unlimited supply.

User avatar
Dolwphin
Posts: 3810
Joined: Jul 10, 2011
Location: Sweden
Contact:

#15742

Post by Dolwphin » November 6th, 2019, 8:12 pm

Love how T.I. is trending #1 with 1.5M Tweets. And then you click on it, and it is all random tweets containing the letters i & t.
Top 300 | https://rateyourmusic.com/~Dolwphin

Member of the Experimental Mafia.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15743

Post by Cippenham » November 7th, 2019, 4:42 pm

Thanks Straka.

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15744

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 8th, 2019, 12:59 pm

K nvm this might be the worst thing kamala has done

http://sandrarose.com/2019/10/outrage-a ... -had-jobs/

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15745

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 6:41 am

sebby wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 8:05 am
Cipp is falling in line with the team he joined up with. Whatever they believe, he believes. If they flip on climate change or anything else you can bet he will as well.
No. I refer you to proof by Dr Rex Fleming and to other scientists. For example as below.

https://notrickszone.com/2019/07/11/phy ... 100-years/

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... ate_change
Last edited by Cippenham on November 9th, 2019, 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15746

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 6:49 am

matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 9:33 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere
I admit you attempted to engage with the science. In a very painful amateur way. And you also posted me links to websites run by oil company stooges and individuals on the fringe of science with degree level education similar to mine. But you still haven't acknowledged that there is an overwhelming consensus amongst the meteorological community that anthropogenic climate change is happening. You will never acknowledge this because it would mean that you have to change your lifestyle and you are too selfish.
But they got it wrong as is proved already.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15747

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 8:54 am

Is Bloomberg going to be the candidate or they are still talking of others entering the race? Eric Holder, anyone but the current poor selection? Also Alan Lichtman who correctly predicts presidential elections, say if Trump is impeached, not convicted that is 4 of 13 key elements achieved to beat him, you would need 6 of the 13, so would not be enough on its own. If there is a Republican challenge to Trump, that would be another element.

https://www.newsweek.com/professor-says ... ms-1462755

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15748

Post by matthewscott8 » November 9th, 2019, 9:27 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 6:49 am
matthewscott8 wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 9:33 am
Cippenham wrote:
November 6th, 2019, 5:21 am
I referred you to actual scientific proof before and we got nowhere
I admit you attempted to engage with the science. In a very painful amateur way. And you also posted me links to websites run by oil company stooges and individuals on the fringe of science with degree level education similar to mine. But you still haven't acknowledged that there is an overwhelming consensus amongst the meteorological community that anthropogenic climate change is happening. You will never acknowledge this because it would mean that you have to change your lifestyle and you are too selfish.
But they got it wrong as is proved already.
What????? You haven't proved anything at any point on this subject

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15749

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 11:29 am

Are you kidding. Dr Fleming explains why the greenhouse theory and model is wrong, that there is a thermal blanket for atmospheric surface conditions, that the sources for this and the transfer of heat upward are the earth gravitational field and it’s impact on convection, the condensation of water vapour, and the radiation effects of two primary trace gases CO2 and H20. And that that radiation role is relatively minor compared to their important role in sustaining life on Earth. He examines every facet of the climate change issue. He concludes there is no correlation of CO2 with temperature in the historical record. He explains the reasons for modern warming in detail. There is plenty of detailed scientific analysis there with references. He explains in detail why CO2 Concentration does not affect temperature. Some of it is hard to understand , for example he refers to the Planck function but overall his analysis is conclusive. He explains about the Maunder Minimum and why cooling will take place in future. His calculations actually prove what he is saying.

Many of the other scientists believe in the model referred to but Dr Fleming explains why it does not work.

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15750

Post by matthewscott8 » November 9th, 2019, 2:46 pm

Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 11:29 am
He explains the reasons for modern warming in detail.
Lol, you slipped up, you admitted global warming is happening.

User avatar
Dolwphin
Posts: 3810
Joined: Jul 10, 2011
Location: Sweden
Contact:

#15751

Post by Dolwphin » November 9th, 2019, 3:50 pm

Top 300 | https://rateyourmusic.com/~Dolwphin

Member of the Experimental Mafia.

User avatar
Dolwphin
Posts: 3810
Joined: Jul 10, 2011
Location: Sweden
Contact:

#15752

Post by Dolwphin » November 9th, 2019, 3:54 pm

Top 300 | https://rateyourmusic.com/~Dolwphin

Member of the Experimental Mafia.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15753

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 5:08 pm

matthewscott8 wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 2:46 pm
Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 11:29 am
He explains the reasons for modern warming in detail.
Lol, you slipped up, you admitted global warming is happening.
There has been warming yes , I already said it. It’s slowed and soon there will be cooling. It’s the reasons for it that Dr Fleming examines.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15754

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 5:10 pm

No comment on the new contenders. As for Hillary she would come in if she thought a leftist had a serious chance .

User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15755

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 9th, 2019, 5:25 pm

I hope Bloomberg runs. He's a capitalist like Biden and Buttigieg and will split the vote.

Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 12737
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#15756

Post by Cippenham » November 9th, 2019, 5:59 pm

I can see Biden not lasting the distance.

matthewscott8
Donator
Posts: 1575
Joined: May 13, 2015
Contact:

#15757

Post by matthewscott8 » November 9th, 2019, 10:19 pm

Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 5:08 pm
matthewscott8 wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 2:46 pm
Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 11:29 am
He explains the reasons for modern warming in detail.
Lol, you slipped up, you admitted global warming is happening.
There has been warming yes , I already said it. It’s slowed and soon there will be cooling. It’s the reasons for it that Dr Fleming examines.
Did you miss the hottest month on record in July, were you in a coma? That was after he said the earth was cooling. Ask yourself why you believe this fringe guy, but you don't believe any of the droves of scientists who are telling you otherwise.

Estonian Bot
Posts: 32
Joined: Nov 09, 2019
Location: Australia
Contact:

#15758

Post by Estonian Bot » November 9th, 2019, 10:35 pm

Ok, boomer.


User avatar
XxXApathy420XxX
Donator
Posts: 19135
Joined: Oct 24, 2011
Contact:

#15759

Post by XxXApathy420XxX » November 10th, 2019, 12:51 am


User avatar
Kublai Khan
Posts: 850
Joined: Nov 09, 2014
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#15760

Post by Kublai Khan » November 10th, 2019, 3:04 am

Cippenham wrote:
November 9th, 2019, 11:29 am
Many of the other scientists believe in the model referred to but Dr Fleming explains why it does not work.
Fleming doesn't seem to have done any new experiments or research, his article is just re-interpreting existing data. If his theories are valid, then other experts will agree. So far they haven't.

Meanwhile, you're still doing the absurd thing of finding one article that matches your political ideas and declaring everything settled. This is the same thing anti-vaxxers do.

Post Reply