
How did you see both 'Blue Velvet Revisited' and 'No Frank in Lumberton'? Theatrically, I presume (at least the former)?
Nope, they are both on KG. "No Frank" I could upload for you, if you like, "Revisited" I don't have anymore.Carmel1379 on Jun 7 2017, 11:31:37 AM wrote:How did you see both 'Blue Velvet Revisited' and 'No Frank in Lumberton'? Theatrically, I presume (at least the former)?
weirdboy on Jun 7 2017, 11:37:40 AM wrote:Hey I know -- why don't you make another joke at my expense?
Yeah, I saw that in a museum in Paris not too long after I had first seen 'Blue Velvet'. I said to my classmates that Isabella Rossellini was actually a great actress, but none of them cared.Perception de Ambiguity on Jun 7 2017, 11:36:09 AM wrote:Green Porno
Yeah, that would be great, thanks.Perception de Ambiguity on Jun 7 2017, 11:38:15 AM wrote:Nope, they are both on KG. "No Frank" I could upload for you, if you like, "Revisited" I don't have anymore.Carmel1379 on Jun 7 2017, 11:31:37 AM wrote:How did you see both 'Blue Velvet Revisited' and 'No Frank in Lumberton'? Theatrically, I presume (at least the former)?
*scratch*Carmel1379 on Jun 7 2017, 01:53:24 PM wrote:Bug Crawls
Having watched the film years ago I did think for a moment while looking at those shots that at least some of them look surprisingly Fulton-esque, but nope.Carmel1379 on Jun 7 2017, 06:25:16 PM wrote:Reality's Invisible?![]()
I see what you mean. It's only missing some superimpositions. Not Baillie either, nope.Carmel1379 on Jun 7 2017, 07:38:26 PM wrote:Clipsony
I see them fine. Maybe you have tinypic.com blocked in your browser?joachimt on Jun 8 2017, 04:41:13 AM wrote:Can't see any pics, perceval.
I'm at work. For some unknown reason tinypic is on their list of blocked webpages.Perception de Ambiguity on Jun 8 2017, 05:00:43 AM wrote:I see them fine. Maybe you have tinypic.com blocked in your browser?joachimt on Jun 8 2017, 04:41:13 AM wrote:Can't see any pics, perceval.
It is on three official lists. So it is clearly less obscure than the film in the non-obscure "name the movie"-thread (it also has more checks). Sorry for doing things wrong.joachimt on Jun 11 2017, 06:45:03 AM wrote:Any hints?
But it has less than 50 checks?perceval on Jun 11 2017, 06:59:47 AM wrote:It is on three official lists. So it is clearly less obscure than the film in the non-obscure "name the movie"-thread (it also has more checks). Sorry for doing things wrong.joachimt on Jun 11 2017, 06:45:03 AM wrote:Any hints?
Yes.joachimt on Jun 11 2017, 07:03:21 AM wrote:But it has less than 50 checks?perceval on Jun 11 2017, 06:59:47 AM wrote:It is on three official lists. So it is clearly less obscure than the film in the non-obscure "name the movie"-thread (it also has more checks). Sorry for doing things wrong.joachimt on Jun 11 2017, 06:45:03 AM wrote:Any hints?
Not a lot of options left, right?weirdboy on Jun 16 2017, 09:48:24 AM wrote:By process of elimination I'm going with Beyroutou el lika (1981)