Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
Podcast: Talking Images (Episode 5 released June 2nd)
Polls: 1950s (Results), 1935 (Results), 1966 awards (Jun 9th)
Challenges: TSPDT, 1960s, China/Hong Kong/Taiwan
Film of the Week: Údolí vcel, July nominations (Jun 26th)
World Cup S4: Round 2 schedule, Match 2A: Poland vs Mexico (Jun 4th), Match 2B: Tajikistan vs Italy (Jun 14th)

Criticker

Post Reply
User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

Criticker

#1

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 3:00 pm

Anyone else here on Criticker? I use it occasionally, but it's a pain in the butt to go through and find everything I've seen. Wish they had IMDb import :( My profile is here anyways: http://www.criticker.com/profile/mightysparks

Also, I was wondering if anyone finds the 'probable score' useful. I think only twice it's predicted anywhere near my actual rating.


Member Profiles:
bal3x
Crinderman
frbrown
jeff_v
jvv
Life as Fiction
Limedebois
mightysparks
PeacefulAnarchy
tommy_leazaq
VincentPrice
Last edited by mightysparks on June 7th, 2012, 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#2

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 3:12 pm

I played around with it a while back, but never actually used the site actively, it seems very good, but one can hardly keep track of all these sites... I find the site a bit too cluttered, another point is that I can hardly assign ratings to films based on a 10 point scale let alone 100 point scale... and the lack of IMDb import is certainly not good, I don't intend to rate things manually on several sites.
Last edited by bal3x on May 30th, 2012, 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#3

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 3:20 pm

Yeah, at one point I was rating stuff on 6-7 different sites. It was awful. I cut out all of them and went back to just iCM and IMDb. Criticker has some fun features, but the lack of IMDb import is a huge pain.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#4

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 3:26 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 09:20:37 AM wrote:Yeah, at one point I was rating stuff on 6-7 different sites. It was awful. I cut out all of them and went back to just iCM and IMDb. Criticker has some fun features, but the lack of IMDb import is a huge pain.
ICM ftw! :) Works great in conjunction with IMDb. Totally enough for my checking needs, other sites are fun to explore, but I don't use them actively.

allisoncm
Posts: 16475
Joined: May 11, 2011
Contact:

#5

Post by allisoncm » May 30th, 2012, 3:40 pm

I am not active on Criticker. Especially when their database wasn't that huge. I will usually rate on 1-10 on IMDB and in my spreadsheet, I'll specify if a film was 6.8 or 4.2 or whatever. However, my profile name is of course, allisoncm.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#6

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 3:45 pm

I kinda wish I'd done .1, .2 etc in my spreadsheet to save myself hassles, but it's too late now. And I'd probably get annoyed at it after a while. I get annoyed enough at other people doing it :P
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#7

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 4:38 pm

Criticker is the best. You don't have to rate out of 100, it'll scale to whatever rating you pick. mightysparks I'm not surprised your predictions aren't that good, although I'd have to think they're at least a little better than imdbs. I'd be curious to know how low your lowest TCI on the site is.

I use criticker all the time, it's a great way to make me keep writing reviews, I get great stats and easy sorting for directors and films and the predictions are pretty accurate most of the time.

Also You can import from imdb since February I don't know why they don't make it more prominent. It had some bugs but last time I checked it worked perfectly. you get a long list of what's imported and it tells you anything that isn't so you can add it to the database. The only problem is that if you already have ratings it imports by tiers, but you can batch edit scores, so it shouldn't be a huge problem. Certainly much easier than when I joined and had to do the whole thing manually.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#8

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 4:46 pm

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 10:38:13 AM wrote:Criticker is the best. You don't have to rate out of 100, it'll scale to whatever rating you pick. mightysparks I'm not surprised your predictions aren't that good, although I'd have to think they're at least a little better than imdbs. I'd be curious to know how low your lowest TCI on the site is.

I use criticker all the time, it's a great way to make me keep writing reviews, I get great stats and easy sorting for directors and films and the predictions are pretty accurate most of the time.

Also You can import from imdb since February I don't know why they don't make it more prominent. It had some bugs but last time I checked it worked perfectly. you get a long list of what's imported and it tells you anything that isn't so you can add it to the database. The only problem is that if you already have ratings it imports by tiers, but you can batch edit scores, so it shouldn't be a huge problem. Certainly much easier than when I joined and had to do the whole thing manually.
OMG, thanks! I would often just peek around in every nook and cranny of the site to find something like this and never did. You're the best (l)

I just want STATS. YAY STATS.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#9

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 4:47 pm

Yeah, thanks peaceful for this link! I was not aware of this option!

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#10

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 4:52 pm

Weird how they changed the rankings though :/ One movie I gave an 8, was changed to a 70. Maybe because my PSI was 55? Weird stuff.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#11

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 4:57 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 10:52:56 AM wrote:Weird how they changed the rankings though :/ One movie I gave an 8, was changed to a 70. Maybe because my PSI was 55? Weird stuff.
It imports by tiers. So the 8 goes to tier 8 which I guess for you is 70. They made a collection for the newly imported films so you can go and batch edit the scores to match what they should be. It's not a problem for new users, obviously, but yeah it's a bit of a pain.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#12

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 5:04 pm

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 10:57:37 AM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 10:52:56 AM wrote:Weird how they changed the rankings though :/ One movie I gave an 8, was changed to a 70. Maybe because my PSI was 55? Weird stuff.
It imports by tiers. So the 8 goes to tier 8 which I guess for you is 70. They made a collection for the newly imported films so you can go and batch edit the scores to match what they should be. It's not a problem for new users, obviously, but yeah it's a bit of a pain.
Oh.. lame. I even had some 9s get put down to 78. I have 18 pages to sort through now :'(
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#13

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 5:09 pm

Yeah, I did an import and it's a mess :( It assigned 100 points across the board so it's like no difference if I rated it 6 or 10 on IMDb.
Don't get this "tier" thingy, more customization during import would be most welcome.

Image
Last edited by bal3x on May 30th, 2012, 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#14

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 5:10 pm

Mine seemed to even out once I got to my 6s, so hopefully it won't be as painful as I thought.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#15

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 5:21 pm

bal3x on May 30 2012, 11:09:10 AM wrote:Yeah, I did an import and it's a mess :( It assigned 100 points across the board so it's like no difference if I rated it 6 or 10 on IMDb.
Don't get this "tier" thingy, more customization during import would be most welcome.

Image
It shouldn't do that at all. Did you already have films rated? It might bug out if you had films rated but not enough to distinguish tiers. Seems like your highest tier was tier 6 so it dumped everything 6 and above there. You're probably better off finding the reset rating links and importing fresh with no ratings.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#16

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 5:23 pm

Perhaps bal3x is just that frisky :P
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#17

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 5:25 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:04:30 AM wrote:
PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 10:57:37 AM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 10:52:56 AM wrote:Weird how they changed the rankings though :/ One movie I gave an 8, was changed to a 70. Maybe because my PSI was 55? Weird stuff.
It imports by tiers. So the 8 goes to tier 8 which I guess for you is 70. They made a collection for the newly imported films so you can go and batch edit the scores to match what they should be. It's not a problem for new users, obviously, but yeah it's a bit of a pain.
Oh.. lame. I even had some 9s get put down to 78. I have 18 pages to sort through now :'(
Yeah it's annoying, but since they're scored consistently at least you know which are which. It might also be a good opportunity to use a wider range of scores.
Go to the import collection they give you, click the "your ratings" radio button on the left and a link that says "batch edit" should appear at the bottom of the page, click that and it makes changing scores a lot quicker.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#18

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 5:29 pm

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 11:25:27 AM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:04:30 AM wrote:
PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 10:57:37 AM wrote:It imports by tiers. So the 8 goes to tier 8 which I guess for you is 70. They made a collection for the newly imported films so you can go and batch edit the scores to match what they should be. It's not a problem for new users, obviously, but yeah it's a bit of a pain.
Oh.. lame. I even had some 9s get put down to 78. I have 18 pages to sort through now :'(
Yeah it's annoying, but since they're scored consistently at least you know which are which. It might also be a good opportunity to use a wider range of scores.
Go to the import collection they give you, click the "your ratings" radio button on the left and a link that says "batch edit" should appear at the bottom of the page, click that and it makes changing scores a lot quicker.
Ah, I missed the 'batch edit' button. That helps a lot. When I started using Criticker, I decided to allow a .5 scale, so I don't wanna start being even more exact now. How do I find my lowest TCI btw?
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#19

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 5:41 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:29:27 AM wrote:Ah, I missed the 'batch edit' button. That helps a lot. When I started using Criticker, I decided to allow a .5 scale, so I don't wanna start being even more exact now. How do I find my lowest TCI btw?
http://www.criticker.com/?tl it might take a day to generate them. Though it'll update them one by one if you click on people's profiles.

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#20

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 5:45 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:23:40 AM wrote:Perhaps bal3x is just that frisky :P
16 Blocks and 2001 both a 100?! Not that frisky! tehe

peaceful, how do I reset the ratings?

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#21

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 5:52 pm

bal3x on May 30 2012, 11:45:28 AM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:23:40 AM wrote:Perhaps bal3x is just that frisky :P
16 Blocks and 2001 both a 100?! Not that frisky! tehe

peaceful, how do I reset the ratings?
At the very bottom of your profile there's a link: http://www.criticker.com/?resetrankings I've never reset my rankings, so you're on your own from there.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#22

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 6:03 pm

Oddly enough, my bottom TCI is an Australian: http://www.criticker.com/profile/meester
TCI: 3.7861
Films in Common: 804
Your 748th Best TCI


Err, the 'Worst TCI' link on my profile gave me this dude instead: http://www.criticker.com/profile/JerryJ/
TCI: 3.8082
Films in Common: 756
Your 750th Best TCI

I have it set to needing a minimum 20% of films in common btw.

And here's my highest ranked: http://www.criticker.com/profile/Barraoc
TCI: 2.3513
Films in Common: 1261
Your 1st Best TCI
Last edited by mightysparks on May 30th, 2012, 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#23

Post by mightysparks » May 30th, 2012, 6:06 pm

PeaceAnarchy:
TCI: 2.8120
Films in Common: 2335
Your 270th Best TCI
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#24

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 30th, 2012, 6:33 pm

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 12:03:00 PM wrote:I have it set to needing a minimum 20% of films in common btw.
That's a little high with as many ratings as you have, somewhere between 10% and 15% is probably fine. Some people like to go even lower, I have mine set at 10%. Also those are some really high TCIs, which probably explains why you said the predictions aren't that great. You really are a unique rater.

User avatar
bal3x
Donator
Posts: 13052
Joined: May 26, 2011
Contact:

#25

Post by bal3x » May 30th, 2012, 6:37 pm

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 11:52:51 AM wrote:
bal3x on May 30 2012, 11:45:28 AM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 11:23:40 AM wrote:Perhaps bal3x is just that frisky :P
16 Blocks and 2001 both a 100?! Not that frisky! tehe

peaceful, how do I reset the ratings?
At the very bottom of your profile there's a link: http://www.criticker.com/?resetrankings I've never reset my rankings, so you're on your own from there.
Yay, this worked! After the clean sweep it converted all ratings properly, i.e. 10-100, 9-90, 8-80 etc.
I did have some 10 odd films rated earlier there so might be a bug in the system. Thanks!
Last edited by bal3x on May 30th, 2012, 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Life as Fiction
Posts: 767
Joined: Aug 21, 2011
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

#26

Post by Life as Fiction » May 31st, 2012, 12:39 am

bal3x on May 30 2012, 11:09:10 AM wrote:Yeah, I did an import and it's a mess :( It assigned 100 points across the board so it's like no difference if I rated it 6 or 10 on IMDb.
Don't get this "tier" thingy, more customization during import would be most welcome.

Image
Is that you, Jon?

Life as Fiction
Posts: 767
Joined: Aug 21, 2011
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

#27

Post by Life as Fiction » May 31st, 2012, 12:45 am

96 titles not in the database. Guess that kills that.

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#28

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 31st, 2012, 1:01 am

Life as Fiction on May 30 2012, 06:45:41 PM wrote:96 titles not in the database. Guess that kills that.
Dude, I've added 1700 films to their database. Those 96 are not going to affect your ratings scale that much. I'll help you add films if you want, though. It's just copy imdb link, copy film description, find a screencap/poster. Used to be a multi week backlog to adding films, but it's pretty quick now.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#29

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 2:11 am

I had 250 not in the database, I clicked on some and most were TV shows and some were shorts. I couldn't be bothered clicking through to find them and add them though.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#30

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 2:16 am

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 12:33:15 PM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 12:03:00 PM wrote:I have it set to needing a minimum 20% of films in common btw.
That's a little high with as many ratings as you have, somewhere between 10% and 15% is probably fine. Some people like to go even lower, I have mine set at 10%. Also those are some really high TCIs, which probably explains why you said the predictions aren't that great. You really are a unique rater.
I changed it to 10. I made it higher after not being happy with the predictions :P

I hate being a unique rater :( I want to find movies I'll like :'(
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#31

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 31st, 2012, 2:32 am

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:11:15 PM wrote:I had 250 not in the database, I clicked on some and most were TV shows and some were shorts. I couldn't be bothered clicking through to find them and add them though.
You could have copied the links and put them into a collection on imdb then you could easily see how many are TV series, which criticker doesn't allow and see if you want to add any of the others.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#32

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 2:34 am

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 08:32:56 PM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:11:15 PM wrote:I had 250 not in the database, I clicked on some and most were TV shows and some were shorts. I couldn't be bothered clicking through to find them and add them though.
You could have copied the links and put them into a collection on imdb then you could easily see how many are TV series, which criticker doesn't allow and see if you want to add any of the others.
Yeah, I thought about that and then I saw the form you have to fill in to add 'em and I decided against it :P
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#33

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 31st, 2012, 2:39 am

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:34:29 PM wrote:
PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 08:32:56 PM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:11:15 PM wrote:I had 250 not in the database, I clicked on some and most were TV shows and some were shorts. I couldn't be bothered clicking through to find them and add them though.
You could have copied the links and put them into a collection on imdb then you could easily see how many are TV series, which criticker doesn't allow and see if you want to add any of the others.
Yeah, I thought about that and then I saw the form you have to fill in to add 'em and I decided against it :P
Most of the form is optional and easily copied from imdb. The only annoying parts can be an image and plot summary if imdb doesn't have one, but that's more of an issue when I'm adding films I haven't seen.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#34

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 2:44 am

PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 08:39:18 PM wrote:
mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:34:29 PM wrote:
PeacefulAnarchy on May 30 2012, 08:32:56 PM wrote:You could have copied the links and put them into a collection on imdb then you could easily see how many are TV series, which criticker doesn't allow and see if you want to add any of the others.
Yeah, I thought about that and then I saw the form you have to fill in to add 'em and I decided against it :P
Most of the form is optional and easily copied from imdb. The only annoying parts can be an image and plot summary if imdb doesn't have one, but that's more of an issue when I'm adding films I haven't seen.
Ergh, I'll see how many valid films I have to add. If there's not many, I'll just add them.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#35

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 2:57 am

How the hell do I write plot summaries for some of these weird short films :( Most of the ones I have to add are some of the wonderful Hollis Frampton shorts.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#36

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 31st, 2012, 3:04 am

mightysparks on May 30 2012, 08:57:16 PM wrote:How the hell do I write plot summaries for some of these weird short films :( Most of the ones I have to add are some of the wonderful Hollis Frampton shorts.
I'll add the Frampton shorts when I watch them on Friday so you can skip those if you want. Usually they have some kind of pattern or identifying feature, I assume. Or you could just copy someone else's bullshit about the film like whoever added many of the Brakhage shorts.

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#37

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 3:06 am

Yeah, I managed to find something for the Birth of Magellan or whatever, but I can't find anything for the Pan shorts. I'll leave the Frampton ones for you then since you know what you're doing.
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
frbrown
Posts: 6135
Joined: Nov 01, 2011
Contact:

#38

Post by frbrown » May 31st, 2012, 3:28 am

So what exactly can you do on Criticker?
Image

User avatar
mightysparks
Site Admin
Posts: 30474
Joined: May 05, 2011
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Contact:

#39

Post by mightysparks » May 31st, 2012, 3:31 am

I submitted some features, but I can't be bothered with the shorts now :(
"I do not always know what I want, but I do know what I don't want." - Stanley Kubrick

iCM | IMDb | LastFM | TSZDT

Image

User avatar
PeacefulAnarchy
Moderator
Posts: 24705
Joined: May 08, 2011
Contact:

#40

Post by PeacefulAnarchy » May 31st, 2012, 3:51 am

frbrown on May 30 2012, 09:28:27 PM wrote:So what exactly can you do on Criticker?
Rate things on a scale of 0 to 100, sort the ratings, get stats on actors, films and directors, filter those ratings much more effectively than imdb advanced search. The biggest thing is the ridiculously uncanny recommendation engine(unless you're mightysparks) which can help you find rare gems that fit your tastes. Be aware criticker has a Turkish mafia too, so some caution is warranted.

Post Reply