Please share with us which films you saw last week. It would be great if you could include some comments on each film. It would be awesome if you could also take some time to comment on everyone else's viewings. Unfortunately, it has reached the point where it is no longer viable for me as host to comment on everyone else's viewings every week (especially since some people like to use the weekly thread to log their viewings and nothing else). I am always keen to promote movie discussion though, so if you comment on my own viewings, I will comment on yours at my earliest convenience.
Please also note that this is intended as a movie discussion thread, not a large image posting thread. Having too many large images makes this thread difficult to navigate through. If you wish to include more than five images in a reply, please use spoiler tags - [spoiler][/spoiler] - to hide extra images.
This is what I saw:
★★★★ = loved it /// ★★★ = liked it a lot; ~7/10 /// ★★ = has interesting elements; ~6/10 /// ★ = did very little for me; ~5/10 and lower
British Sounds (1970). Footage of Britain in the late 1960s is spliced together with political discussions in this documentary from Jean-Luc Godard and Jean-Henri Roger. Much of the film comes with historical events recounted by an adult and then repeated by a child who struggles so much to repeat everything that he does not seem to comprehend it - something that one might interpret as symbolic. For a politically charged film though, the project is actually more interesting when focused on the "struggle between images and sounds" with lots of wordplay as per Godard norm, including days of the week written with dollar signs and other title cards popping up with the voiceover sometimes contradicting them. The film certainly has a few potent things to say about class divides and subjugated women, but the sound/image angle somewhat muffles the politics. (first viewing, online) ★★
Film Portrait (1972). Jerome Hill uses footage and photographs from his childhood, as well as excerpts from his later films, to recount his life story in this autobiographical documentary with a difference. The difference is that Hill does not just present the footage; he also sometimes manipulates it in wild and unpredictable ways, from adding animation, to spinning photo cut-outs, to superimposing shots over each other and so on. The operative word though is "sometimes"; most of the footage and photographs are not manipulated at all and while Hill's introductory comments about separating the "me that was" from his present self are fascinating, his voice-over narration is actually a bit dull overall. Growing up at the same time that cinema was beginning to evolve (the silent to sound transition etc), Hill's life as a filmmaking is certainly quite interesting though. (first viewing, online) ★★
Trapped (1973). Locked in a department store overnight, a customer has to contend with vicious guard dogs in this improbable but effective thriller starring James Brolin. The set-up does not make much sense (Dobermans would surely make lots of mess; where is a good Chopping Mall robot when you need one?), however, all concerned take the premise, run with it and make it work. There is some remarkable tight camerawork as Brolin has to leap across furniture pieces and ledges to avoid the dogs, all of his canine encounters are intense and his blurred vision towards the end is frighteningly conveyed via distortion effects. The second half of the film is generally less effective though with lots of cutaways to other characters trying to find him, which break the tension. All of the characters are really good though and generally transcend stereotype. (first viewing, online) ★★★
11 x 14 (1977). One of James Benning's first two films, this is quite similar in approach and yet vastly different too. The technique is the same: lengthy shots edited together without any semblance of a narrative, but whereas his later films would focus on natural vistas and small roads bounded by nature, a large number of shots here feature people and several occur indoors. The result is less enchanting and comes minus the playfulness of One Way Boogie Woogie, his other film from 1977. Quite a few scenes are certainly memorable: a seemingly rundown small cinema; a shot that pans across several streets; a smoking billboard ad that really stands out against a lush green field. Several shots (a train ride?) just linger for minutes on end though and everything feels so random compared to Benning's subsequent films that focus on skies, lakes and so on. (first viewing, online) ★★
Dark Night of the Scarecrow (1981). Far from the killer scarecrow horror movie one might expect given the promotional artwork and title, this is more of a mystery thriller as four rednecks are tormented by someone unknown after they lynch a man hiding in scarecrow gear. There is a genuine eeriness to the men finding random scarecrows planted in their fields and while the methods of dispatch are predictable, the death scenes work because we do not see the scarecrow kill them. Some have chalked this up as a weakness, but the ambiguity of what is going on is the film's best asset and the ending is actually weak as it confirms a solution without bothering to try to explain it. Generally speaking, this rocks with Charles Durning in fine form, a great turn from young Tonya Crowe and some neat Potemkin lion reaction shots from garden gnomes. (first viewing, online) ★★★
Tetsuo (1989). Surviving an assault by a woman with pieces of metal protruding from her body, a businessman soon finds his own body turning into metal in this Japanese body horror movie. The film does not have much in the way of plot, mostly consisting of various transformations and penetrations, but the whole thing is immensely watchable due to how insane it all is, and employing everything from sped-up shots to rapid-fire edits to stop motion animation, this is an amazing assault on the senses. Much like the best films of David Cronenberg, the movie could also be read as a look at the relationship between human bodies and technology. Indeed, with all of the metal absorbed throughout, the film almost seems to question why we rely so heavily on metal - and at what point will our reliance on metal be so great that it does actually become a part of us. (first viewing, online) ★★★★
Scissors (1991). Recovering from an attempted rape in which she fought off her attacker with a pair of scissors, a nervous young woman deals with past trauma as repressed memories are suddenly reawakened in this nifty thriller starring a young Sharon Stone. It is certainly curious seeing Stone play very mousy and reserved and there is some initial intrigue involving a wheelchair-bound neighbour and his brother who may or may not have ulterior motives. Where the film really comes alive though in its second half in which Stone finds herself trapped inside a soundproof high rise apartment with unbreakable windows and no door knobs to exit the apartment. The film ends very potently too with a telling final stare. That said, it never quite makes sense why the film focuses so much on one particular character who later turns out to be a red herring. (first viewing, online) ★★★
The Johnsons (1992). Septuplet test tube babies (who have since grown into deranged men) stalk and harass their estranged sister in this Dutch horror film. With the sister and brothers sharing some sort of mental/telepathic connection - and the way the brothers all act in synchrony without talking - the movie brings Cronenberg's The Brood to mind, but this is a lot less atmospheric and less complex. The story is actually pretty odd and might have something to do with black magic and a plot to bring about the end of the world. Or not. What can be said for sure is that the characters spend far too much time talking and discussing what to do with the film only really coming alive in the final half-hour as focus switches the septuplets in action. There is a lot of vivid bloodletting in this stretch, but as a narrative the film remains head-scratching stuff overall. (first viewing, online) ★★
Rendez-Vous (2015). Billed as a thriller, this Dutch drama circles around a couple who move from Holland to France where they are manipulated by builders and handymen working on their place. It is an idea with potential, but the thriller elements never take off due to the filmmakers trying to make things saucy and steamy as the housewife is seduced by the youngest worker. The 'cunning' scheme always feels silly since it relies on the husband being such an absentminded workaholic and so inattentive to his wife's needs that she just has to seek affection elsewhere. Meanwhile, a more intriguing angle of one of the older workers getting too close to the children is left hanging. The early scenes certainly offer definite promise and the con scheme has some intriguing elements, but topped off with a nonsensical ending, this is a really difficult film not to dislike. (first viewing, online) ★
Far from the Madding Crowd (2015). Determined not to marry, a nineteenth century heiress manages to attract the attention of three very different suitors in this romantic melodrama starring Carey Mulligan. The film begins well with Mulligan bluntly stating "I have no need of a husband" and constantly rejecting the need to marry to be happy. As the film progresses though, she becomes less independently-minded and more and more keen on marriage. The reason for her gradual change of heart is never clear (wanting a family or loneliness?) and it is hard to watch such a forward-thinking lady choosing to conform to conventional notions regarding what it means to be content in life. The film certainly looks lovely with lots of moody skies and lush fields, and a down-to-earth Matthias Schoenaerts is excellent, but the trajectory of the film is, frankly, maddening. (first viewing, online) ★
The Green Fog (2017). Using clips from movies shot in San Francisco - and various fog effects - Guy Maddin and his Forbidden Room collaborators remake Hitchcock's Vertigo here. With a constant brooding music score and some excellent choice cuts, Maddin and his team successfully capture the atmosphere of the 1958 classic throughout even when the actors on screen change and the found footage jumps between colour and black and white. That said, the scenes that work best are the ones modeled around actual shots from Vertigo and these are in the minority; the film also sometimes feels repetitive despite the brief runtime, but this is a pretty encapsulating ride. The recreation of the bell tower ending is just magnificent, there is some nifty screens within screens stuff and the dialogue-free first fourteen minutes are amazingly compelling. (first viewing, online) ★★★
Happy as Lazzaro (2018). Constantly exploited but never wise to it, a young man's life takes some strange turns as he becomes complicit in a fake kidnapping in this offbeat drama from Italy. The film is not especially subtle about its thematic agenda as characters discuss how everybody exploits someone else, while Lazzaro seems to be the one exception and happier for it. Is ignorance really bliss? Certainly Lazzaro's journey is fascinating, especially after unexpected mid-point turn as he ends up venturing into a world he never knew, something that brings Being There to mind. Is Lazzaro a simpleton or someone who has trouble understanding the outside world, or is he just benevolent like nobody else out there? The film certainly has a lot of interest as a look at a kind man remaining content in an unkind world, but Lazzaro does quite often just seem naïve. (first viewing, online) ★★★
Mothers' Instinct (2018). Guilt-ridden after her neighbour's son falls to his death in her care, a young housewife begins to wonder if the boy's mother blames her and wants revenge in this psychological thriller from Belgium. The movie has been compared to the films of Hitchcock and the growing tension and distrust between the two women certainly comes across well. Veerle Baetens and Anne Coesens are both excellent in the lead roles and the first three quarters here are entirely fueled by all the uncertainty in the air; is Baeten simply paranoid or is Coesens actually trying to hurt her back? The final quarter of the film is less effective as it settles on one particular route. Character motivations become very inconsistence in this final stretch too. For the most part though, this is a riveting look at a friendship shattered by grief and mutual feelings of guilt. (first viewing, online) ★★★
Ruben Brandt, Collector (2018). Distracted by recurring nightmares in which figures from renowned paintings come alive and attack him, a therapist neglects his patients who turn to art theft in this unusual animated movie from Hungary. The animation style is quite unique, with all humans looking halfway between horses and Picasso paintings, and the nightmare sequences are amazing - in particular, one with a gag in which a nude woman's pussy attacks him. The non-nightmare parts are less engaging though. The interiors look great (e.g. an office with aquarium floors and walls), but the heist and detective investigation angles feel by-the-books; characterisation is also a pivotal part of the best heist movies and here we never really get to know anyone. The nightmares are divine though; it would have been awesome to have a whole film simply stuck in his head. (first viewing, online) ★★
Transit (2018). Set in an alternative reality in which the Nazis have invaded modern day France (minus certain technical developments), this German drama comes with a fascinating premise and the blurring of the 1940s and 2010s is certainly intriguing. What the film has to offer beyond a unique set-up though is debatable. It is sort of about one man's quest to flee Nazi-occupied France, but there is zero tension in the air as he gets distracted by playing surrogate father to a boy and lover to a refugee woman. There are some bouts where we see bureaucratic red tape madness but they are very occasional. There is also a lot of bland voiceover narration that spells out the obvious ("then he packed"; "he looked with weary eyes"). A blaring rendition of 'Road to Nowhere' by Talking Heads at the end feels wrong too - though the lyrics do sort of suit how the film feels. (first viewing, online) ★
Synchronic (2019). Two paramedics begin to wonder if the increasingly bizarre overdoses that they are seeing are connected to a new designer drug in this typically mind-bending ride from Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead. The film looks sensational as the directors toy with what is in and out of focus while also including grandiose camerawork, and coupled with all of the mystery regarding what exactly is going on, the first half of Synchronic is riveting. There are also thought-provoking postulations about time from a quantum physics perspective. As the film progresses though, the explanation comes closer to fantasy (or just magic) than science fiction; the plot also devolves into race-against-time thriller dynamics. Everything is so moody and atmospheric though and Anthony Mackie is so perfectly human and sympathetic that the film still works. (first viewing, cinema) ★★★
Other
RR (2007). James Benning assembles various shots of trains going past his camera in this film titled after the common abbreviation for 'railroad'. Shots vary in terms of camera angles and distances; sometimes the camera looks up, sometimes down and some shots are further away than other shots are. Otherwise, this is pretty standard James Benning film, give or take a handful of occasions in which indistinct radio broadcasts are heard (what relation these broadcasts have to the train footage is unclear). This is not an unpleasant way to pass the time, but there is none of the gradual changes that make something like Casting a Glance so alluring, nor is there is the playfulness of One Way Boogie Woogie. Viewers really into locomotives might get a lot more out of the film though and some of the scenery that the trains pass by is certainly nice. (first viewing, online) ★★
Ruhr (2009). As per the title, James Benning assembles six lengthy shots of life in the Ruhr district of Germany in this project. The film has a pretty great final shot, aptly selected for the poster, in which we see smoke billowing out of a building, beautifully illuminated against a moody sky. Benning adds much uncertainty and even tension to this shot as we occasionally hear sirens in the background (is the fire deliberately lit or under control?). The other five shots of the films are unfortunately less enchanting though and feel rather randomly chosen and spliced together. The forest canopy with occasional intruding plane noises is probably the next most effective shot, but watching a mural slowly spray painted or a prayer service from the back pews is only ever as interesting as it sounds - and the film feels like it would lose very little with a little shortening. (first viewing, online) ★
O'er the Land (2009). Opening with a quote from a World War II veteran dismissing heroism and hero worship before cutting to a Civil War reenactment and the spectators watching, this anti-narrative movie from Deborah Stratman gets off to a fascinating start. As Stratman cuts to a sports stadium with fans similarly watching in awe at their beloved players getting ready for a match, she draws a curious parallel between sport and war and how those involved similarly tend to attract admiration. After this point though, the film quickly becomes more random and less focused with cutaways to empty houses, fire engines getting ready, forests and so on without much sense of rhyme or rhythm to the way that everything is put together. A drawn-out wailing siren aside, the whole thing is fairly pleasant to listen to and watch, but it seldom seems to cut deep. (first viewing, online) ★★
Meat (2010). Workers in a busy butcher shop have trouble controlling their libidos, eventually resulting in a suspicious death that may or may not be murder in this experimental movie from the Netherlands. While the remnants of a narrative can be deduced, there is not much in the way of plot here and as the film progresses any sense of reality is blurred. Are the dead man and the police inspector dead ringers, doppelgangers or one and the same person? Does the butcher shop really house live animals that are allowed to roam free? Do customers really visit in the nude? While it is hard to work out what exactly the filmmakers were going for here, there is at least nary a boring moment to be had with so much weirdness going on. The film is very creatively shot too from a variety of camera angles, including a large number of bird's-eye shots. (first viewing, online) ★★