Welcome to the ICM Forum. If you have an account but have trouble logging in, or have other questions, see THIS THREAD.
NOTE: Board emails should be working again. Information on forum upgrade and style issues.
Podcast: Talking Images (Episode 22 released November 17th * EXCLUSIVE * We Are Mentioned in a Book!!! Interview with Mary Guillermin on Rapture, JG & More)
Polls: Directors (Waiting for results), 1929 (Results), Directorial Debut Features (Mar 12th), DtC - Nominations (Mar 20th), Favourite Movies (Mar 28th)
Challenges: UK/Ireland, Directed by Women, Waves from around the World
Film of the Week: Lean on Pete, April nominations (Apr 1st)

The Film Lounge

Post Reply
User avatar
weirdboy
Donator
Posts: 4032
Joined: January 3rd, 2016, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19561

Post by weirdboy »

I remember the film but no idea who directed it without looking it up.
blocho
Donator
Posts: 4409
Joined: July 20th, 2014, 6:00 am
Contact:

#19562

Post by blocho »

I visited my parents for dinner today, and my father pulled out some old family photos. He showed me a picture of my grandfather from the late 1940s, and it suddenly struck me that he looked a lot like Jack Palance. What do you guys think? Have a look.

Image
JW1996
Posts: 4
Joined: February 13th, 2021, 2:23 pm
Contact:

#19563

Post by JW1996 »

Cippenham wrote: February 19th, 2021, 8:08 am A lot of the above are on no official lists
I agree, but still, I love these lists. I try to find what is common with these movies, and what genre the director love.
Many of them but the way are very old movies. The love old classics!
JW1996
Posts: 4
Joined: February 13th, 2021, 2:23 pm
Contact:

#19564

Post by JW1996 »

blocho wrote: February 20th, 2021, 4:13 am I visited my parents for dinner today, and my father pulled out some old family photos. He showed me a picture of my grandfather from the late 1940s, and it suddenly struck me that he looked a lot like Jack Palance. What do you guys think? Have a look.

Image
Before I read your message, I just looked at the images, and I thought that these are two images of the same person :D
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13434
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#19565

Post by Cippenham »

Later might create another little list with the Wright and Tarantino selections
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13434
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#19566

Post by Cippenham »

They said Scorsese had seen a lot of films so would be high in ICM
User avatar
Lakigigar
Posts: 1663
Joined: October 31st, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

#19567

Post by Lakigigar »

I was considering participating in this year's ICM top 1000. I didn't participate in 2019 and 2020, but I did in 2018 (a top 100). I feel like I can send a very qualitative top 100 this year, that's not the issue, but i'm very critical of myself, and feel like I don't have the right to participate because 1) most people have seen 5 to 10 times more than I did (I have almost seen 1000 movies) and 2) i just haven't seen enough so the ones i don't vote for are not necessarily movies I dislike, but movies I haven't seen. I have seen a lot from the 21st century though (744 films), but only 184 from the 20th century. Obviously my top 100 will be filled with 21st century titles. The good thing is: it balances out with users that like older or classic movies more. But still i'm not happy with it.

I've seen 245 movies from the top 1000. 54 films of my top 100 are already in the top 1000 (currently).

So not sure, was wondering what others would think about it
User avatar
joachimt
Donator
Posts: 33412
Joined: February 16th, 2012, 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

#19568

Post by joachimt »

Wasn't Une journée d'Andrei Arsenevitch an episode of Cinéma de notre temps? My spreadsheet says so, but it is a standalone title on IMDb now.
ICM-profile
Fergenaprido: "I find your OCD to be adorable, J"
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13434
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#19569

Post by Cippenham »

Lak is just as entitled to take part as anyone. If it was me I would concentrate first on completing the top 100 on TSPDT to start with and build from there to get more 20th century greats watched. You won’t like all but will learn a lot from then and may lead to exploring more from certain directors.
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13434
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#19570

Post by Cippenham »

https://www.icheckmovies.com/lists/tara ... cippenham/

Just created a list of films mentioned on the podcast by Edgar Wright and Tarantino. I have seen none of these... :lol:
User avatar
Lakigigar
Posts: 1663
Joined: October 31st, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

#19571

Post by Lakigigar »

I've only seen 24 movies of TSPDT top 100 but i'm first focusing on completing my (urgent) watchlist. Some titles of TSPDT top 100 are also on that though. I'm (very) slowly starting to explore more 20th century movies. So it's probably not going to happen in 2021 but it might in 2022.

I hope to see half of TSPDT top 100 by thr end of the year af least
User avatar
funkybusiness
Donator
Posts: 10893
Joined: January 22nd, 2013, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19572

Post by funkybusiness »

joachimt wrote: February 20th, 2021, 8:26 pm Wasn't Une journée d'Andrei Arsenevitch an episode of Cinéma de notre temps? My spreadsheet says so, but it is a standalone title on IMDb now.
yes it was but it also received a theatrical release so maybe imdb editors are getting cute.
User avatar
clemmetarey
Donator
Posts: 2422
Joined: November 20th, 2011, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19573

Post by clemmetarey »

Lakigigar wrote: February 20th, 2021, 8:25 pm I was considering participating in this year's ICM top 1000. I didn't participate in 2019 and 2020, but I did in 2018 (a top 100). I feel like I can send a very qualitative top 100 this year, that's not the issue, but i'm very critical of myself, and feel like I don't have the right to participate because 1) most people have seen 5 to 10 times more than I did (I have almost seen 1000 movies) and 2) i just haven't seen enough so the ones i don't vote for are not necessarily movies I dislike, but movies I haven't seen. I have seen a lot from the 21st century though (744 films), but only 184 from the 20th century. Obviously my top 100 will be filled with 21st century titles. The good thing is: it balances out with users that like older or classic movies more. But still i'm not happy with it.

I've seen 245 movies from the top 1000. 54 films of my top 100 are already in the top 1000 (currently).

So not sure, was wondering what others would think about it
When I had seen 1000 movies I felt I would be more qualified to talk about films if I had seen 1500. Right now I'm at 3300+ and I still feel like I haven't seen enough. There will always be someone who have seen more, who knows more, who have a list you feel is better/more balanced/more eclectic than yours, a era/genre/area you don't know enough about. What matters is your taste, what you like, and the films you'd like to give a boost with your list. A list of favorite films is a list that features the films you like the most, nothing else. :)
Also, I'd rather have your list offering a different perspective than one filled with usual suspects.
Cippenham
Donator
Posts: 13434
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Dorset England
Contact:

#19574

Post by Cippenham »

Just seen Strongroom 1962 recommendation by Tarantino and it has 18 checks but one of the best films I have seen for ages :thumbsup:
User avatar
Onderhond
Posts: 6160
Joined: December 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19575

Post by Onderhond »

clemmetarey wrote: February 21st, 2021, 11:44 pm When I had seen 1000 movies I felt I would be more qualified to talk about films if I had seen 1500. Right now I'm at 3300+ and I still feel like I haven't seen enough.
I hit 10.000 this weekend and sometimes it feels like I still just scratched the surface. The only tip I can give is to explore the type of cinema that feels most promising to you and don't worry too much about what others deem worthy. There comes a time when you'll have more time to fill than there are films that excite you, which is the perfect moment to explore beyond your own interests.
User avatar
Lonewolf2003
Donator
Posts: 10653
Joined: December 29th, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19576

Post by Lonewolf2003 »

Lakigigar wrote: February 20th, 2021, 8:25 pm I was considering participating in this year's ICM top 1000. I didn't participate in 2019 and 2020, but I did in 2018 (a top 100). I feel like I can send a very qualitative top 100 this year, that's not the issue, but i'm very critical of myself, and feel like I don't have the right to participate because 1) most people have seen 5 to 10 times more than I did (I have almost seen 1000 movies) and 2) i just haven't seen enough so the ones i don't vote for are not necessarily movies I dislike, but movies I haven't seen. I have seen a lot from the 21st century though (744 films), but only 184 from the 20th century. Obviously my top 100 will be filled with 21st century titles. The good thing is: it balances out with users that like older or classic movies more. But still i'm not happy with it.

I've seen 245 movies from the top 1000. 54 films of my top 100 are already in the top 1000 (currently).

So not sure, was wondering what others would think about it
Like others already have said; of course you can participate! Your vote is worth as much as anyone else! It's an user list, so it's meant to represent the taste of our users and you are also an user on this forum. It doesn't matter how much you've seen. Maybe if we ever did some kind of expert list, than it would be a whole other discussion who qualifies as an expert on that kind of movies, but for a general user list everyone can vote. Votes of users who watch and like 21st century titles more than TSPDT darlings and classics or worth as much as those who've seen the whole TSPDT.
User avatar
Lakigigar
Posts: 1663
Joined: October 31st, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

#19577

Post by Lakigigar »

Well, I and 2 friends were talking about Hitler (i didn't start it lol). One of them is an ex-military veteran of 22 years who worked at the marine, was shot; went in coma, was declared dead, and surprisingly woke up. During later work, he felt of a roof and is partially paralysed on his feet and also suffers from brain damage because of being shot (shocks, loss of pain, and more). But I like him a lot. He's very much anti-war. Fine, we were talking about Hitler and to my surprise he proposed to watch The Great Dictator from Charlie Chaplin which surprised me a lot. So I agreed. The other one also agreed. I was of the opinion I would probably never watch a Chaplin movie or not very soon. But otherwise it would have been like a crappy Netflix movie, like the latest Bay, so I quickly agreed to prevent that from happening.

So, we watched it. To my surprise, i liked it. But I had no subtitles at all, so I understood like 50% of it. Of course the story isn't complicated, there is a lot of visual and slapstick humor, but I might've missed some more subtle references and humor. That being said, some scenes were absolutely brilliant. Hard to believe this movie was made in 1940... . I liked the movie to my surprise, but I could've appreciated the movie more with subs (i'm much better at reading than listening). If I don't like Chaplin's other movies, i will appreciate him for this, although i'll have to rewatch this for sure. It also made me curious of other Chaplin movies, so i'm not going to avoid him now.
User avatar
prodigalgodson
Posts: 705
Joined: July 30th, 2011, 6:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

#19578

Post by prodigalgodson »

Nice laki. I'm not much of a Chaplin fan, but that was a very pleasant surprise for me too.
User avatar
Lakigigar
Posts: 1663
Joined: October 31st, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

#19579

Post by Lakigigar »

It might've not been a language issue, but a brain, mental or hearing issue. but I can perfectly follow Isaac Arthur's science channel, political channels, PBS Nova shows, and let's play's, CNN's election night and US political debates. I also had no trouble with It Follows, but I did have trouble when I rewatched Snow White, so i used subs after 5 mins.

Ironically, I once tried to watch the dutch movie Simon. I couldn't understand most of it. But if i hear Dutchies talk, i can't understand them. On the dutch movie website moviemeter.nl, some dutch people complain about not understanding flemish movies either, so it's not an issue of me alone, but because of the stark language differences on short distances (regional language, dialects, accents, influence of foreign and "new" language as well as the presence of west-flemish and frisian all sort of fucked this up.

So yes, i can say I can't understand some movies in my native language very well lol.
User avatar
St. Gloede
Moderator
Posts: 12061
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#19580

Post by St. Gloede »

Lakigigar wrote: February 25th, 2021, 7:54 pm Hard to believe this movie was made in 1940...

What about the film made it odd/surprising for the 40s?

And what was it that made you disinterested in Chaplin?

I'm a bit mixed on The Great Dictator as well. Some great scenes, but I didn't love it. Perhaps just a little bit too farcical for me. Should perhaps give it a rewatch, as I have not seen it since I was a teenager. I prefer his bleak serial killer comedy Monsieur Verdoux and the stunning melancholy of Limelight if we are talking about his sound era work - which I just might prefer to his silents.
User avatar
Onderhond
Posts: 6160
Joined: December 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19581

Post by Onderhond »

St. Gloede wrote: February 26th, 2021, 10:28 am I prefer his bleak serial killer comedy Monsieur Verdoux and the stunning melancholy of Limelight if we are talking about his sound era work - which I just might prefer to his silents.
Sounds like I should give these a chance, just to compare. So far Chaplin is the absolute worst for me (literally, the single most track record for all directors I've seen a substantial amount of films from), maybe I'll find his non-silent/slapstick work easier to stomach.
User avatar
St. Gloede
Moderator
Posts: 12061
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#19582

Post by St. Gloede »

Would be really interested in hearing your takes on these.
User avatar
pitchorneirda
Posts: 401
Joined: February 11th, 2019, 12:07 pm
Location: France
Contact:

#19583

Post by pitchorneirda »

I'm mostly annoyed by Keaton's slapstick work but that's not the case for Chaplin's. Uninterested maybe, but I wouldn't call it "the worst". Chaplin has always tried to add a touch of emotion and sensitivity that almost never fails to hit the mark
"Art is like a fire, it is born from the very thing it burns" - Jean-Luc Godard
User avatar
Lakigigar
Posts: 1663
Joined: October 31st, 2015, 6:00 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

#19584

Post by Lakigigar »

I'd thought slapstick was nothing for me, but I'd tolerated it more than I expected. The Great Dictator is also much more than just slapstick.
User avatar
Onderhond
Posts: 6160
Joined: December 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19585

Post by Onderhond »

pitchorneirda wrote: February 26th, 2021, 11:21 am I'm mostly annoyed by Keaton's slapstick work but that's not the case for Chaplin's. Uninterested maybe, but I wouldn't call it "the worst". Chaplin has always tried to add a touch of emotion and sensitivity that almost never fails to hit the mark
I have a lot less trouble with Keaton for some reason, though I prefer his stunt work over his full-on comedy bits. Chaplin's Tramp just trigger me :D

@St. Gloede: will see if I can slip in Monsieur Verdoux somewhere in the near future.
User avatar
St. Gloede
Moderator
Posts: 12061
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 6:00 am
Contact:

#19586

Post by St. Gloede »

Onderhond wrote: February 26th, 2021, 11:52 am @St. Gloede: will see if I can slip in Monsieur Verdoux somewhere in the near future.
Awesome, can't wait.
User avatar
Ebbywebby
Posts: 3869
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 6:00 am
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

#19587

Post by Ebbywebby »

St. Gloede wrote: February 26th, 2021, 11:12 am Would be really interested in hearing your takes on these.
Really? You would?
User avatar
Good_Will_Harding
Posts: 1016
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 7:00 am
Contact:

#19588

Post by Good_Will_Harding »

Last minute Golden Globe predix, even though the only reason to watch this show every year is to see celebs getting increasingly more drunk as it goes on - which we may not even get this year. :shrug:

Pic D: Chicago 7
Pic CM: Borat 2
Dir: Fincher
Actress D: Mulligan
Actor D: Boseman
Actress CM: Bakalova
Actor CM: Baron Cohen
Supp Actress: Close
Supp Actor: Kaluuya
Screenplay: Chicago 7
Score: Soul
Song: Speak Now
Animated: Soul
Foreign: Minari
Post Reply